“…[26] However, the pristine SnTe has its drawbacks with regards to its usage as a thermoelectric material such as high charge carrier concentration (≈10 21 cm -3 ) due to the intrinsic nature of SnTe to have high Sn vacancies, small bandgap often leading to bipolar conduction, and the large energy separation between the two valence band maxima (≈0.35 eV), all of which leads to a low S and high κ e , thus ultimately lower zT in pristine stochiometric SnTe. [26][27][28][29][30][31] Due to larger anharmonicity and effective phonon scattering, PbTe exhibits lower thermal conductivity than SnTe. [32][33][34][35] Various attempts and strategies have been made in the past to improve the thermoelectric performance in SnTe, which includes selfcompensation in the composition with some additional Sn content; [36,37] electronic bandstructure engineering-fostering resonance state in the vicinity of fermi-level (mostly induced by In as a dopant in SnTe), [27,38] simultaneous increase of principal bandgap and convergence of the light hole and heavy hole valence bands (realized with dopants such as Cd, Hg, Mn, Mg, Ca, and few more), [27,29,36,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44] and this also includes valence band inversion or crossing effects; and a diverse nano-structuration approaches to engineer the dense interstitials, stacking faults, point defects, nano-precipitates and semi-coherent interfaces, dislocations, strain clusters, and so forth, [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] (by alloying with Cu 2 Te, CdS, SrTe, ZnS, and a few more).…”