2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance fiber-shaped flexible asymmetric supercapacitor based on MnO2 nanostructure composited with CuO nanowires and carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 As shown in Figure 5h, the Ragone plot of the PPy VANA/ CNTF-based FSSC is compared with the counterpart based on the carbon-based fiber reported recently. The PPy VANA/ CNTF supercapacitor displays an energy density as high as 6.22 mW h cm −3 at a power density of 123.25 mW cm −3 , which are comparable to or better than those of the reported FSSCs, such as CF (9.4 mW h cm −3 at 13 mW cm −3 ), 60 MnO 2 /CF (0.22 mW h cm −3 at 400 mW cm −3 ), 61 Ti 3 C 2 T x / RGO//PANI/RGO (3.4 mW h cm −3 at 10.2 mW cm −3 ), 62 copper wire@CuO@MnO 2 //CNT@MnO 2 (0.38 mW h cm −3 at 25.5 mW cm −3 ), 63 and CFF@V 2 O 5 //CFF@AC (0.928 mW h cm −3 at 17.5 mW cm −3 ). 64 Additionally, Table S1 further shows the performance comparison of the PPy VANA/CNTF FSSC with that of the reported FSSCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 As shown in Figure 5h, the Ragone plot of the PPy VANA/ CNTF-based FSSC is compared with the counterpart based on the carbon-based fiber reported recently. The PPy VANA/ CNTF supercapacitor displays an energy density as high as 6.22 mW h cm −3 at a power density of 123.25 mW cm −3 , which are comparable to or better than those of the reported FSSCs, such as CF (9.4 mW h cm −3 at 13 mW cm −3 ), 60 MnO 2 /CF (0.22 mW h cm −3 at 400 mW cm −3 ), 61 Ti 3 C 2 T x / RGO//PANI/RGO (3.4 mW h cm −3 at 10.2 mW cm −3 ), 62 copper wire@CuO@MnO 2 //CNT@MnO 2 (0.38 mW h cm −3 at 25.5 mW cm −3 ), 63 and CFF@V 2 O 5 //CFF@AC (0.928 mW h cm −3 at 17.5 mW cm −3 ). 64 Additionally, Table S1 further shows the performance comparison of the PPy VANA/CNTF FSSC with that of the reported FSSCs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 A plasma-modified fiber is obtained by continuously bombarding it with the highenergy electrons and ions generated by gas discharge, which increases the roughness of the fiber surface, providing higher temperatures and larger contact areas. [31][32][33][34] Moreover, a large number of oxygen-containing reactive groups can be introduced to improve the reactivity of the fiber surface, so that the hydrophilicity and adhesion of the fiber surface can be improved. Further, the friction between fibers can be increased, accompanied by possible chemical reactions that can modify the fiber surface either physically or chemically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, 1D conducting metal wires or carbon-based fibers as the current collector, [10][11][12][13] accompanied with other capacitive loadings, such as metal oxides and conductive polymers, were used. [14][15][16] For example, Li et al used Ni(NO 3 ) 2 and Co(NO 3 ) 2 as the capacitive precursors. [17] The resultant composite FSC electrode was prepared by synthesizing nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide (Ni-Co LDH) on carbon fiber (CF) via a constant current deposition process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%