2015
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1100319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Performance HR Practices, Work Stress and Quit Intentions in the Public Health Sector: Does person–organization fit matter?

Abstract: Drawing on the attraction-selection-attrition (ASA) framework, this paper examines a mechanism, namely person-organization (P-O) fit, through which high performance HR practices (HPHRP) affect two negative employee outcomes: work-related stress and quit intentions. Using a sample of Egyptian public health sector workers, a mediation model is tested empirically using structural equation modelling. The study results show that HPHRP positively affected P-O fit, which in turn had significant negative associations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly there are many contingent factors that enable PWB and organisational performance practices to exist in harmony (Ogbonnaya, Daniels, Connolly, & van Veldhoven, 2017), such as age of employees (Kooij et al, 2013) and national culture (Malek, Mearns, & Flin, 2010). In addition to these exogenous factors that organisations may not be able to influence, there are however endogenous factors that can be shaped, such as focusing on innovation and creating a positive organisational climate without using work intensification practices (Heffernan & Dundon, 2016), and establishing selection practices aimed at recruiting employees that have high organisation and/or job-person fit (Mostafa, 2016).…”
Section: Context For Mutual Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly there are many contingent factors that enable PWB and organisational performance practices to exist in harmony (Ogbonnaya, Daniels, Connolly, & van Veldhoven, 2017), such as age of employees (Kooij et al, 2013) and national culture (Malek, Mearns, & Flin, 2010). In addition to these exogenous factors that organisations may not be able to influence, there are however endogenous factors that can be shaped, such as focusing on innovation and creating a positive organisational climate without using work intensification practices (Heffernan & Dundon, 2016), and establishing selection practices aimed at recruiting employees that have high organisation and/or job-person fit (Mostafa, 2016).…”
Section: Context For Mutual Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examination of this relationship addresses calls for research on the sources of affect within organizations (Saavedra and Kwun, 2000). Finally, this study responds to calls for more research on the HPHRPemployee outcomes link in the public sector, where most of the existing research on this relationship has been focused in private sector organizations (Messersmith et al, 2011;Mostafa, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most startling growth has been the increase in two areas. First in HRM, and particularly around public service motivation (MacVicar et al 2000;Liu et al 2015;Caillier 2016;Mostafa 2016;Teo et al 2016), and second around the theme of citizen/user engagement and co-productionthe latter case growing from 0 to 9 per cent (Poocharoen and Ting 2015;Voorberg, Bekkers, and Tummers 2015;Alford 2016;Wiewiora, Keast, and Brown 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%