1996
DOI: 10.1080/10826079608005497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Determination of Duloxetine and Desmethyl Duloxetine in Human Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma was assayed for duloxetine using a validated HPLC with fluorescence detection method over the linear concentration range of 1 ng ml -1 to 100 ng ml -1 (Covance Labs, Madison, WI, USA) in Study 2A] and using the previously described HPLC/MS/MS method in Study 2B. The HPLC/fluorescence assay is a modification of the HPLC/fluorescence assay published by Johnson et al [9]. Duloxetine and the internal standard (analogue of duloxetine) were extracted from alkaline plasma with methylene chloride and the extracted analytes were derivatized with dansyl chloride prior to injection onto a C18 HPLC column.…”
Section: Studies 2a and 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma was assayed for duloxetine using a validated HPLC with fluorescence detection method over the linear concentration range of 1 ng ml -1 to 100 ng ml -1 (Covance Labs, Madison, WI, USA) in Study 2A] and using the previously described HPLC/MS/MS method in Study 2B. The HPLC/fluorescence assay is a modification of the HPLC/fluorescence assay published by Johnson et al [9]. Duloxetine and the internal standard (analogue of duloxetine) were extracted from alkaline plasma with methylene chloride and the extracted analytes were derivatized with dansyl chloride prior to injection onto a C18 HPLC column.…”
Section: Studies 2a and 2bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the GC-MS method [19], the proposed method has higher extraction yields (>90% versus 75%) and better sensitivity (LOQ = 2 ng mL −1 versus 50 ng mL −1 ). When compared to the HPLC-FL method [18], the proposed method is certainly much more feasible, since it does not require any timeconsuming and expensive derivatisation step, and uses lower volumes of plasma (450 L instead of 1 mL), while reaching a better sensitivity level (LOQ = 2 ng mL −1 versus 5 ng mL −1 ). The HPLC-MS method briefly described by Lantz et al [12] has better sensitivity (0.5 ng mL −1 ), however it requires more expensive instrumentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The method is also selective: neither endogenous compounds nor any of the central nervous system drugs tested has produced any interference in the analysis of DLX in depressed patients' plasma. The use of SPE poses several advantages with respect to the liquid-liquid extraction procedures used by other authors [18,19]: in fact, the SPE procedure is faster and requires lower volumes of organic solvents. The proposed method is also advantageous for other reasons: it has high accuracy and a wide linearity range, which allows the determination of the analyte not only at therapeutic doses but also in overdose cases and when administered at sub-therapeutic doses (e.g., scarce patient compliance).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A GC-MS method was used for DLX analysis in post-mortem specimens after a liquid-liquid extraction procedure [12]. Other methods are based on HPLC, coupled to different detectors [9,[13][14][15][16]. In particular, one is based on HPLC with fluorescence detection after derivatisation with dansyl chloride, and analyses are carried out for DLX and its main metabolite in human plasma [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%