2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of bile acid profiles in serum of women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
82
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For bile acids, LOQ ranged from 2nmol/l to 50nmol/l. After correction for sample volume, this was comparable or slightly better than what has been reported in recent publications providing LOQ values [16,[18][19][20][23][24] (Table 4). For C4, LOQ was 5nmol/l, which is similar to what was reported by DeBarber et al [25].…”
Section: Limit Of Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For bile acids, LOQ ranged from 2nmol/l to 50nmol/l. After correction for sample volume, this was comparable or slightly better than what has been reported in recent publications providing LOQ values [16,[18][19][20][23][24] (Table 4). For C4, LOQ was 5nmol/l, which is similar to what was reported by DeBarber et al [25].…”
Section: Limit Of Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Table 4 summarizes and compares extraction recoveries of the here and previously reported methods for the measurement of bile acids and C4. Extraction recoveries for bile acids were quite similar to those reported for other existing methods [16][17][18]20,[22][23][24]. The extraction recovery for C4 was found to be approximately 62%, which was markedly lower than for bile acids and for other C4 methods [12,14,[25][26].…”
Section: Recoverysupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[15][16][17] Within the past decade, LC-MS has been heavily utilized for the separation and detection of BAs in human and animal model biofluid samples. 9,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The most comprehensive of these methods have a relatively long analytical cycle (> 30 minutes), precluding rapid sample analysis. 21,25,28,30,34 On the other hand, the most rapid methods (< 10 minutes) have limited BA coverage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%