2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.11.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance motion control for optical satellite tracking systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is essential to mitigate the impact of these adverse factors to improve the precision and stability of the telescope pointing system. Currently, for the telescope's high-precision pointing control methods, Thomas et al [9] have employed a combination of robust loop shaping and disturbance observer methods to ensure robust stability across the entire operational range. This approach enhances the performance of precision satellite systems and reduces the servo error by a factor of 3.8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is essential to mitigate the impact of these adverse factors to improve the precision and stability of the telescope pointing system. Currently, for the telescope's high-precision pointing control methods, Thomas et al [9] have employed a combination of robust loop shaping and disturbance observer methods to ensure robust stability across the entire operational range. This approach enhances the performance of precision satellite systems and reduces the servo error by a factor of 3.8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, many methods have been proposed for disturbance rejection in electrooptical tracking systems. Techniques like adaptive control [12], disturbance observers (DOB) [13], active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) [14,15] are utilized for system disturbance rejection. These methods offer higher system adaptability, stronger disturbance resistance, and better capability to handle complex dynamic environments compared to PID control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the nonlinearity of the AMB system and coupled multibody dynamics, a suitable controller for multibody spacecraft is required. Some nonlinear control methods have been studied in the literature for the nonlinear and coupled system, such as robust control (Bai et al, 2019), high-precision tracking control (Riel et al, 2020), sliding-mode control (Chen et al, 2019; Yu and Xie, 2019), adaptive control (Hu et al, 2020; Wu et al, 2020a), backstepping control (Feng et al, 2020; Yu et al, 2014), and iterative learning control (Gao et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2013). These control methods are efficient in addressing imbalance and uncertainty problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%