2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance reduction technique for multiscale finite element modeling (HPR-FE2): Towards industrial multiscale FE software

Abstract: The authors have shown in previous contributions that reduced order modeling with optimal cubature applied to finite element square (FE 2 ) techniques results in a reliable and affordable multiscale approach, the HPR-FE 2 technique. Such technique is assessed here for an industrial case study of a generic 3D reinforced composite whose microstructure is represented by two general microcells accounting for different deformation mechanisms, microstrucural phases and geometry arrangement. Specifically, in this app… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method was extended to reduce mechanics at interfaces [26,27], at finite strains [28,29] and in space-time [30], as well. Further data-driven approaches were exploited, for instance based on clustering [31][32][33] or proper orthogonal decomposition [34,35].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was extended to reduce mechanics at interfaces [26,27], at finite strains [28,29] and in space-time [30], as well. Further data-driven approaches were exploited, for instance based on clustering [31][32][33] or proper orthogonal decomposition [34,35].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodic Boundary Conditions (BCs) were applied at pairs of opposing faces of the RVE [ 45 ]: where and are pairs of points that belong to opposite faces of the RVE, which was considered to have a cubic geometry for this work. The whole procedure is depicted in Figure 7 and detailed in Algorithm 1, and additional details were given in [ 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. The computational tool used for the in-fill homogenization was the in-house software Kratos Multiphysics [ 54 ].…”
Section: Computational Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this has the advantage of avoiding the need for constitutive equations, this comes at an increased computational cost that can be prohibitive (Lange et al 2021). Recently, a number of researchers addressed this issue through techniques such as model reduction, GPU programming, and replacement of lower-scale solutions with machine learning-based surrogate models (Fritzen and Hodapp 2016;Raschi et al 2021;Rocha et al 2021). HMM and EFM are similar approaches that employ a macro-scale model with large time steps, in which the primary variables evolve through the solution of a micro-scale model over smaller time steps (Tretiak et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%