2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-2017-54
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Performance Software Framework for the Calculation of Satellite-to-Satellite Data Matchups (MMS version 1.2)

Abstract: Abstract. We present a Multisensor Matchup System (MMS) that allows systematic detection of satellite based sensor-tosensor matchups and the extraction of local subsets of satellite data around matchup locations. The software system implements a generic matchup-detection approach and is currently being used for validation and sensor harmonisation purposes. An 10 overview of the flexible and highly configurable software architecture and the target processing environments is given. We discuss improvements implem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We validate the cloud mask performance using a match-up database (MD), of comparisons between satellite and in situ observations, covering all instruments in the sensor series [31]. We filter matches on the basis of in situ and satellite observations flagged as high quality, a maximum spatial separation of 10 km and a maximum time difference of four hours.…”
Section: Cloud Mask Validation and Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We validate the cloud mask performance using a match-up database (MD), of comparisons between satellite and in situ observations, covering all instruments in the sensor series [31]. We filter matches on the basis of in situ and satellite observations flagged as high quality, a maximum spatial separation of 10 km and a maximum time difference of four hours.…”
Section: Cloud Mask Validation and Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTTOV v11.3 radiative transfer is coupled with a Cox and Munk parameterisation of surface reflectance and glint [30], to determine suitability for cloud detection purposes. We compare simulated and observed reflectance in the 0.6 and 0.8 µm channels using an SST match-up database [31] including all AVHRR sensors used in the data record. Clear-sky matches were selected using Bayesian cloud detection with infrared channels only, including checks for bad data, navigation and calibration problems.…”
Section: Simulating Clear-sky Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%