“…The precision rate is obtained as a ratio of the successfully tracked frames in the current video image. MobileTrack is compared with 23 published trackers, containing SiamRPN++ [17], SiamMask [22], HiFT [46], DaSiamRPN [47], SiamRPN [14], ECO‐gpu [48], ECO‐HC [48], C‐COT [10], SiamFC [13], AutoTrack [1], ARCF [49], ARCF‐H [49], SRDCF [7], BACF [50], CSR‐DCF [51], DSiam [52], MEEM [8], KCF [4], GFSDCF [53], MDNet [54], GlobalTrack [56], CIFT [57], and DAFSiamRPN [58], where the UAV tracking algorithms are HiFT, CIFT, DAFSiamRPN AutoTrack, ARCF, ARCF‐H and BACF. The trackers’ results are taken from the dataset officially provided, from the authors, and from test results in the survey [55].…”