2010
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
284
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
17
284
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…After data collection, we performed a statistical single factor test to evaluate whether common method bias was a problem in our dataset. Since there are few techniques to detect common method bias for formative scales (Booth, Park, & Glomb, 2009), we conducted Harman's one-factor test (Scott & Bruce, 1994;Podsakoff & Organ, 1986;Zhou et al, 2008;Patel & Cardon, 2010;Messersmith & Guthrie, 2010), which is commonly used to assess the existence of common method variance at item level.…”
Section: Controlling For Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After data collection, we performed a statistical single factor test to evaluate whether common method bias was a problem in our dataset. Since there are few techniques to detect common method bias for formative scales (Booth, Park, & Glomb, 2009), we conducted Harman's one-factor test (Scott & Bruce, 1994;Podsakoff & Organ, 1986;Zhou et al, 2008;Patel & Cardon, 2010;Messersmith & Guthrie, 2010), which is commonly used to assess the existence of common method variance at item level.…”
Section: Controlling For Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, turnover intention has been the key measure to assessing an organization's performance. In particular, the researchers show that employees' low turnover intention positively affects an organization's financial performance, including sales [47], profit [48], return on assets [49], and even customer service in the retail setting [26].…”
Section: Turnover Intention and Perceived Organizational Sustainabilimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite concerns that the additional labour costs associated with using HPWPs may outweigh their productivity-enhancing benefits (Faems, Sels, de Winne and Maes 2005;Way 2002), HPWPs have been found in small businesses to raise labour productivity and reduce voluntary turnover (Deshpande and Golhar 1994;Faems et al2005;Messersmith and Guthrie 2010;Sels et al 2006;Way 2002), and to be associated with financial performance and profitability (Sels et al 2006, p. 319;Wu, Hoque and Bacon 2011). It would appear, therefore, that the positive relationship identified between HPWPs and performance in firms more generally (for reviews of the HPWP-performance literature, see: Becker and Huselid 1998;Combs, Liu, Hall and Ketchen 2006) (Curran and Blackburn 2000, p.12), and the support services offered to small businesses through the Jobcentre Plus Small Business Recruitment Service, which provides professional and financial support and advice on recruitment, pre-employment training, on-thejob training, apprenticeships and work trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%