2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5030490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High photoresponse of individual WS2 nanowire-nanoflake hybrid materials

Abstract: van der Waals solids have been recognized as highly photosensitive materials that compete conventional Si and compound semiconductor based devices. While 2-dimensional nanosheets of single and multiple layers and 1-dimensional nanowires of molybdenum and tungsten chalcogenides have been studied, their nanostructured derivatives with complex morphologies are not explored yet. Here, we report on the electrical and photosensitive properties of WS 2 nanowirenanoflake hybrid materials we developed lately. We probe … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the primary direct contact with the chalcogenide films was meant to be Ti, some Pt also deposited on the films around the perimeter of the Ti under-metallization due to the imperfect contact between the shadow mask and the substrate. Considering the typical bandgap, electron affinity and the work function values of bulk MoS 2 (E g ∼1.3 eV, χ∼4.0 eV and j∼5.25 eV) [32,33] and WS 2 (1.4, 4.0 and 5.1 eV) [34] as well as the work function values of Ti (j Ti ∼4.3 eV) and Pt (j Pt ∼5.3 eV), we find that the contact between Ti and the chalcogenide films is Schottky-type (figures 2(b) and (e)), whereas it is quasi-ohmic with Pt (figures 2(c) and (f)). Furthermore, because of the better alignment of the Fermi level of Pt with the valence band of MoS 2 in reference to WS 2 , the ohmic character is also expected to be better, which explains the good linearity of the I-V slopes and higher conductivity for the MoS 2 based devices and slight nonlinearity measured for the WS 2 based ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the primary direct contact with the chalcogenide films was meant to be Ti, some Pt also deposited on the films around the perimeter of the Ti under-metallization due to the imperfect contact between the shadow mask and the substrate. Considering the typical bandgap, electron affinity and the work function values of bulk MoS 2 (E g ∼1.3 eV, χ∼4.0 eV and j∼5.25 eV) [32,33] and WS 2 (1.4, 4.0 and 5.1 eV) [34] as well as the work function values of Ti (j Ti ∼4.3 eV) and Pt (j Pt ∼5.3 eV), we find that the contact between Ti and the chalcogenide films is Schottky-type (figures 2(b) and (e)), whereas it is quasi-ohmic with Pt (figures 2(c) and (f)). Furthermore, because of the better alignment of the Fermi level of Pt with the valence band of MoS 2 in reference to WS 2 , the ohmic character is also expected to be better, which explains the good linearity of the I-V slopes and higher conductivity for the MoS 2 based devices and slight nonlinearity measured for the WS 2 based ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterostructures of WS 2 nanowires and nanoflakes obtained by the sulfurization of WO 3 nanowires showed p-type properties. [86][87][88] In addition, doping WS 2 lattice with Ta atoms changes the electrical properties of the material from semiconducting to metallic. [70] Room temperature ferromagnetic behavior of WS 2 monolayers was detected for both NAPH [43] and DMF [89] exfoliated samples.…”
Section: Tungsten Disulfide and Tungsten Diselenidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoconductivity measurement setup is derived from the one used in our previous studies; 21,31 a constant bias of 3 V is applied to the sample by using a sourcemeter (Keithley 2636A SYSTEM SourceMeter®) connected in series with a 1 MU load resistor. Three different lasers (Coherent® OBIS™ Laser System, TEM00 mode, with wavelengths of 661 nm, 552 nm, and 401 nm and 1/e 2 beam diameters of 9 mm, 7 mm, and 8 mm, respectively) are modulated by using a signal generator (33220A, Agilent Technologies, Inc.) applying square waves with a duty cycle from 5% to 50% and frequency from 10 kHz up to 1 MHz depending on the laser wavelength.…”
Section: Device Fabrication and Photoconductivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%