“…Furthermore, it is important to point out that the performers' degree of experience is elementary for a successful recanalization and a long-term patency rate, especially when treating complex cases such as these, requiring stenting of the iliocaval confl uence as in our second case [15,16]. Beside possible re-stenosis and persistence of symptoms, invasive treatment harbours a low risk of major bleeding from 0.3 -1.1 %, vessel perforation, compartment syndrome, pulmonary embolism from 0.2 % -0.9 %, periprocedural mortality from 0.1 % -0.7 %, stent fracture, and stent dislocation as well as early thrombosis from 1.0 % -6.8 % [3,11,14,17,18]. In addition, it is important to note that the radiation exposure increases with the complexity of the intervention, particularly in young patients undergoing interventions of the inferior vena cava plus both iliac veins, radiation exposures needs to be considered.…”