2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07762-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High power and low critical current density spin transfer torque nano-oscillators using MgO barriers with intermediate thickness

Abstract: Reported steady-state microwave emission in magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ)-based spin transfer torque nano-oscillators (STNOs) relies mostly on very thin insulating barriers [resulting in a resistance × area product (R × A) of ~1 Ωμm2] that can sustain large current densities and thus trigger large orbit magnetic dynamics. Apart from the low R × A requirement, the role of the tunnel barrier in the dynamics has so far been largely overlooked, in comparison to the magnetic configuration of STNOs. In this report,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thin free layer leads to a low critical current density according to Eq. 1 26 , and the MgO barrier thickness is in an intermediate range with a large TMR, which also contributes to decrease the critical current density as reported recently 25 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The thin free layer leads to a low critical current density according to Eq. 1 26 , and the MgO barrier thickness is in an intermediate range with a large TMR, which also contributes to decrease the critical current density as reported recently 25 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Hence, considering the resistance mismatch between the amplifier and the STNO, the measured output power is only a fraction of actual emitted power of the STNO. In order to eliminate the effect of impedance mismatch, the integrated matched output power (P out ) of each device is calculated as follows (Costa et al, 2017):…”
Section: Experimental Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 2-3 orders of magnitude performance improvement is expected using MTJ-Memristor NCSs compared with the CMOS-based NCSs. The use of nano-oscillators specified for NCSs, one order of magnitude improvement in performance compared to the use of MTJ neuron, where full switching is used [critical current density: ∼10 6 A/cm 2 (Costa et al, 2017) vs. ∼10 7 A/cm 2 (Fukami et al, 2016)], is expected. Finally, thermally assisting STNOs using laser can improve the power consumption by 40%.…”
Section: Comparison With Cmos-based Ncsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spintronic-based NCSs, magnetic switching in magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) [6] or magnetic oscillation in spin torque nano-oscillator (STNO) [7][8] is used to mimic neuron firing. While using oscillation of magnetic moment decreases the power consumption by an order of magnitude compared with magnetic moment switching (critical current: ~10 6 Acm -2 [9] vs ~10 -7 Acm -2 [10]), still there is a huge gap between spintronic-based NCS and brain in terms of power consumption and speed. This is due to high power consumption and low speed of the traditional way of oscillating the magnetic moment through bias current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%