2017
DOI: 10.3390/met7100447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Power Diode Laser (HPDL) for Fatigue Life Improvement of Steel: Numerical Modelling

Abstract: This paper deals with the improvement of fatigue life of AISI 1040 steel components by using a High Power Diode Laser (HPDL). First, the meaningfulness of each operational parameter was assessed by varying the experimental laser power and scan speed. After laser treatment, fatigue tests were performed to investigate the influence of laser processing parameters on the material resistance. The fatigue tests were carried out by using a rotating bending machine. Wöhler curves were obtained from the analysis of exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the prediction accuracy, with most experiments, is within the thermal camera accuracy of 1%. This prediction accuracy is a significant improvement compared to the peak temperature prediction accuracy between 3.5% and 7% found in literature [9,[44][45][46]. Furthermore, the cooling rate prediction accuracy of the adaptive thermal model is between 1.4% and 15.0%.…”
Section: Adaptive Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the prediction accuracy, with most experiments, is within the thermal camera accuracy of 1%. This prediction accuracy is a significant improvement compared to the peak temperature prediction accuracy between 3.5% and 7% found in literature [9,[44][45][46]. Furthermore, the cooling rate prediction accuracy of the adaptive thermal model is between 1.4% and 15.0%.…”
Section: Adaptive Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The peak temperature prediction accuracy is between 1.2% and 6.1%. In comparison, other researchers state that their thermal models predict the peak temperature of the LHT process with an accuracy between 3.5% and 7% [9,[44][45][46]. Hence, the prediction accuracy of the thermal model developed in Chapter 3, even without adaptation, is already better compared to these other models.…”
Section: Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The laser transformation hardening process consists of high-speed local heating of the surface layer by a laser beam above critical temperature points for the austenitic structure formation and subsequent rapid cooling of the treated surface using heat transfer in the inner layers of the material [4,12]. As a consequence, the fine-grained martensitic structure is formed due to phase transformations, which are characterized by a high wear resistance for AISI 1045 steel [13], R260 grade rail steel [14], and AISI 8620 steel [15], corrosion resistance for AISI 1045 steel [16], and fracture resistance for AISI 1040 steel [17]. It should also be noted that the martensiticaustenitic structure formation depends on the laser surface hardening regimes and the carbon concentration in the alloy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the development of predictive models appears to be a virtual solution in order to reduce time and costs in finding the optimal operational process conditions. To this end, many research studies have focused on the development of relationships between process parameters and process responses [21][22][23]. Thus, research in laser hardening process development, optimization, modelling and simulation plays a critical role in advancing surface engineering science and technology [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%