2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2012.0244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐precision hyperboloid location method using passive time‐difference‐of‐arrival measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ∆ is the PDE error that corresponds to the effective SNR which is obtained using (33) and that of matrix a is: 14 …”
Section: Appendix A: Derivation Of Relative Grs Geometry and Pd Matrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where ∆ is the PDE error that corresponds to the effective SNR which is obtained using (33) and that of matrix a is: 14 …”
Section: Appendix A: Derivation Of Relative Grs Geometry and Pd Matrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this nonlinearity, several methods are developed to solve these equations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] either in linear/closed-form method or nonlinear/open-form method [1,12]. In the nonlinear method, the first step is to linearize the nonlinear hyperbolic equations using series expansion such as the Taylor series expansion method [13][14][15]. An initial random position of emitter is first inputted and iteratively refined to the final position estimate by minimizing the least square (LS) cost function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current satellite interference source localization methods mainly use the time difference of arrival (TDOA) and the frequency difference of arrival (FDOA) measured by the signals received from the main satellite and the adjacent satellites to determine the location. The localization methods can be classified into analytical methods [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], optimized solutions [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and intelligent algorithms [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] in recent years. The analytical methods derive the closed-form solution of the nonlinear localization equation set based on mathematical approximation and the intermediate variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…radar, sonar, and wireless networks [1]. A series of works on TDOA localisation algorithms have been published [2][3][4][5]. Generally, the attainable mean-square errors (MSEs) of these algorithms are lower bounded by the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%