2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Precision Measurement of 186Os/188Os and 187Os/188Os: Isobaric Oxide Corrections with In-Run Measured Oxygen Isotope Ratios

Abstract: We present a novel method for high precision measurement of (186)Os/(188)Os and (187)Os/(188)Os ratios, applying isobaric oxide interference correction based on in-run measurements of oxygen isotopic ratios. For this purpose, we set up a static data collection routine to measure the main Os(16)O3(-) ion beams with Faraday cups connected to conventional 10(11) amplifiers, and (192)Os(16)O2(17)O(-) and (192)Os(16)O2(18)O(-) ion beams with Faraday cups connected to 10(12) amplifiers. Because of the limited number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 186 Os/ 188 Os, 187 Os/ 188 Os and 190 Os/ 188 Os ratios for DROsS (Durham Romil Osmium Standard supplied by IAGeo Limited) yielded 0.11994 ± 0.00006 (0.52‰), 0.16092 ± 0.00005 (0.31‰) and 1.98381 ± 0.00010 (0.05‰), respectively, using 50 ng of Os measured in static mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 20); 0.11993 ± 0.00018 (1.5‰), 0.16091 ± 0.00012 (0.78‰) and 1.98385 ± 0.00020 (0.10‰), respectively, using 1 ng of Os by static mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 21); and 0.11983 ± 0.00097 (8.1‰), 0.16079 ± 0.00029 (1.8‰) and 1.98451 ± 0.00377 (1.9‰), respectively, using 0.1 ng of Os by a peak‐jumping mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 12). These results agreed well with the previously published data for the same material (Luguet et al , Wittig et al , Liu and Pearson , Chatterjee and Lassiter , Chu et al ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The 186 Os/ 188 Os, 187 Os/ 188 Os and 190 Os/ 188 Os ratios for DROsS (Durham Romil Osmium Standard supplied by IAGeo Limited) yielded 0.11994 ± 0.00006 (0.52‰), 0.16092 ± 0.00005 (0.31‰) and 1.98381 ± 0.00010 (0.05‰), respectively, using 50 ng of Os measured in static mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 20); 0.11993 ± 0.00018 (1.5‰), 0.16091 ± 0.00012 (0.78‰) and 1.98385 ± 0.00020 (0.10‰), respectively, using 1 ng of Os by static mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 21); and 0.11983 ± 0.00097 (8.1‰), 0.16079 ± 0.00029 (1.8‰) and 1.98451 ± 0.00377 (1.9‰), respectively, using 0.1 ng of Os by a peak‐jumping mode (2 s and 2 RSD, n = 12). These results agreed well with the previously published data for the same material (Luguet et al , Wittig et al , Liu and Pearson , Chatterjee and Lassiter , Chu et al ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…), 0.160920 ± 12 (Chu et al . ) and 0.160922 ± 3 (Chatterjee and Lassiter ) using 10 11 Ω amplifiers and 192OsO3 signals of > 1.3 V. Along with the increase in 192OsO3 intensities from 0.02 to 0.35 V, the precision of the 187 Os/ 188 Os ratios significantly improves from 801 to 107 ppm (2 RSD; Figure a). The precision of 107 ppm (2 RSD) at 192OsO3 intensities of 0.20–0.35 V is larger than that of 25 ppm at 192OsO3 intensities of > 1.3 V (Luguet et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…) and Nd (NdO + , DePaolo and Wasserburg ) utilised a uniform O isotopic composition of Nier (): 17 O/ 16 O = 0.000375 and 18 O/ 16 O = 0.002044; more recently, it has been recognised that Nier's O isotopic ratios deviate from the O mass fractionation trend and that O isotopic compositions can vary within individual or across multiple measurements (e.g., in the Os (OsO3) isotopic measurements, Walker , Chatterjee and Lassiter , Chu et al . ). In order to overcome these issues, it is now recommended to use line by line measured O isotopic ratios by measuring, x M 16 O3 x−1 M 16 O 2 17 O − and x−2 M 16 O 2 18 O − on Faraday cups mounted with high feedback 10 12 Ω or 10 13 Ω resistor current amplifiers (Chu et al .…”
Section: Advances In Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 97%
“… , Touboul and Walker , Liu and Pearson , Chatterjee and Lassiter , Chu et al . , Bermingham et al . , Nagai and Yokoyama , Worsham et al .…”
Section: Advances In Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation