2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00015k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision measurement of W isotopes in Fe–Ni alloy and the effects from the nuclear field shift

Abstract: A rapid and precise protocol for W isotopic analysis via MC-ICPMS and the effects of the nuclear field shift on chemically processed samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
45
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are published in Cook and Schönbächler (2016). Epsilon values based on SRM 129c have the following external precisions: ± 0.05 for ε 184 W (6/3), ± 0.07 for ε 182 W (6/3), and ± 0.08 for ε 182 W (6/4) (Cook and Schönbächler, 2016). The external precision of SRM 129c is similar to that derived using the bracketing standard NIST SRM 3163.…”
Section: High-precision Pt and W Isotope Measurementssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These data are published in Cook and Schönbächler (2016). Epsilon values based on SRM 129c have the following external precisions: ± 0.05 for ε 184 W (6/3), ± 0.07 for ε 182 W (6/3), and ± 0.08 for ε 182 W (6/4) (Cook and Schönbächler, 2016). The external precision of SRM 129c is similar to that derived using the bracketing standard NIST SRM 3163.…”
Section: High-precision Pt and W Isotope Measurementssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…All five W isotopes, along with the interference monitors 178 Hf, 181 Ta, and 188 Os, were measured simultaneously in static mode (Cook and Schönbächler, 2016). Single measurements of each sample were bracketed by measurements of the NIST SRM 3163 W Uncertainties are based on the W bracketing standard (NIST SRM 3163) or the long-term reproducibility defined by repeated measurements of SRM 129c (denoted by an asterisk; Cook and Schönbächler, 2016), whichever is larger. a See Table 1 for definition of groups.…”
Section: High-precision Pt and W Isotope Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(), or the method we propose here, since both provide sufficient yield and matrix separation. However, deviations in 183 W/ 184 W that are attributed to nuclear field shift effects (e.g., Cook and Schönbächler , Kruijer and Kleine ) have been reported for generalised applications of the Kleine et al . () separation protocol, suggesting that use of these protocols requires caution.…”
Section: Historical and Current W Separation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%