2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision Mg isotope analyses of low-Mg rocks by MC-ICP-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
70
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
13
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard materials were also analysed, with d 26 Mg = À0.20 ± 0.09‰ for BCR-2, d 26 Mg = À0.27 ± 0.01‰ for BHVO-2 and d 26 Mg = À0.48 ± 0.03‰ for GSR-3. These values are consistent with previously published data (À0.36 to À0.16‰ for BCR-2 and À0.32 to À0.16‰ for BHVO-2; Teng et al, 2007Teng et al, , 2015Huang et al, 2009Huang et al, , 2011Huang et al, , 2015An et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The standard materials were also analysed, with d 26 Mg = À0.20 ± 0.09‰ for BCR-2, d 26 Mg = À0.27 ± 0.01‰ for BHVO-2 and d 26 Mg = À0.48 ± 0.03‰ for GSR-3. These values are consistent with previously published data (À0.36 to À0.16‰ for BCR-2 and À0.32 to À0.16‰ for BHVO-2; Teng et al, 2007Teng et al, , 2015Huang et al, 2009Huang et al, , 2011Huang et al, , 2015An et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The total procedural Mg blank was lower than 20 ng, negligible relative to the 50 μg loaded into the column. The standards in this study yielded δ 26 Mg = −0.26 ± 0.01‰ (2SD, n = 4) for BHVO‐2 and −0.22 ± 0.02‰ (2SD, n = 4) for BCR‐2 (Table ), which were consistent with published values within error (e.g., An et al, ; Teng et al, , ; Teng, Li, Ke, et al, ; Teng, Li, Rudnick, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results are reported in the conventional δ notation that is defined as δ X Mg = [( X Mg/ 24 Mg) sample / ( X Mg/ 24 Mg) DSM3 − 1] × 1000, where X = 25 or 26, and DSM3 is an international reference of solution made from pure Mg metal . Analyses of the well-characterized USGS standard BHVO-2 in this study yielded δ 26 Mg = − 0.28 ± 0.04‰ (2SD, n = 6, Table 1), in agreement with previously reported values Huang et al, 2009;Pogge von Strandmann et al, 201 l;An et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%