2003
DOI: 10.1086/374996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Precision Near-Infrared Photometry of a Large Sample of Bright Stars Visible from the Northern Hemisphere

Abstract: We present the results of 8 yr of infrared photometric monitoring of a large sample of stars visible from Teide Observatory (Tenerife, Canary Islands). The final archive is made up of 10,949 photometric measures through a standard InSb single-channel photometer system, principally in JHK, although some stars have measures in L 0 . The core of this list of stars is the standard-star list developed for the Carlos Sánchez Telescope. A total of 298 stars have been observed on at least two occasions on a system car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…d GJ 504b's effective temperature, surface gravity, bolometric luminosity, and mass are estimated by comparing its age (160 +350 −60 Myr) and J H K s L -band magnitude with the most commonly used cooling model (Baraffe et al 2003). For quantifying best estimates and lower/upper limits for all of these quantities, we apply the same calculation as described in Section 4.2. e The provided errors of the stellar J H K photometry are less than 0.01 mag (Kidger & Martín-Luis 2003), while L photometry was obtained in this work with an error of 0.09 mag (see Section 3.5). f The H-band photometric magnitude is based on the weighted mean of the March and May values.…”
Section: Age Of Gj 504mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…d GJ 504b's effective temperature, surface gravity, bolometric luminosity, and mass are estimated by comparing its age (160 +350 −60 Myr) and J H K s L -band magnitude with the most commonly used cooling model (Baraffe et al 2003). For quantifying best estimates and lower/upper limits for all of these quantities, we apply the same calculation as described in Section 4.2. e The provided errors of the stellar J H K photometry are less than 0.01 mag (Kidger & Martín-Luis 2003), while L photometry was obtained in this work with an error of 0.09 mag (see Section 3.5). f The H-band photometric magnitude is based on the weighted mean of the March and May values.…”
Section: Age Of Gj 504mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…(c) Morel et al (1978); Bessell et al (1998);Ducati et al (2002). (d) Glass (1974); Glass (1975); Mould & Hyland (1976); Morel et al (1978); Leggett (1992); Ducati et al (2002); Kidger & Martín-Luis (2003); the 2MASS catalogue (Cutri et al 2003). (e) We refered to Colina et al (1996) for the apparent magnitudes of the Sun.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the result of the Hipparcos photometric observation estimated that the star remains in an MS stage with a spectral type of K1 V, recent reports showed a spectral type of M2 III (Kidger et al 2003;Tsvetkov et al 2008). The color index of HD 220074 was estimated to be approximately 1.7 by Hipparcos data, which was reduced afresh by Leeuwen (2007) and shows the same result.…”
Section: Fundamental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The V − K color of 4.39 is similar to an M2 giant (V − K = 4.30) in Bessel & Brett (1988), which also indicates that the star is likely to be a giant. As a result, HD 220074 should be an M2 giant star (Kidger et al 2003;Tsvetkov et al 2008). …”
Section: Fundamental Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%