1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(94)00756-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High pressure neutron diffraction studies of the magnetic structures of erbium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The experimental results at 6.5, 7.5, 10.5, and 12 kbar are nearly identical, except for the alterations due to the systematic shifts in the transition temperatures and the ͑minor͒ differences shown in Fig. 2, which appear below 10-20 K. This indicates that Q must behave in the same way in the four cases and similar to that measured by Kawano et al 15 at 11.5 and 14 kbar. Thus, at 7.5 kbar, Q is assumed to be locked to the value 2 7 c* below about 45 K, and to be the same as at ambient pressure above this temperature.…”
Section: ͑5͒supporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 The experimental results at 6.5, 7.5, 10.5, and 12 kbar are nearly identical, except for the alterations due to the systematic shifts in the transition temperatures and the ͑minor͒ differences shown in Fig. 2, which appear below 10-20 K. This indicates that Q must behave in the same way in the four cases and similar to that measured by Kawano et al 15 at 11.5 and 14 kbar. Thus, at 7.5 kbar, Q is assumed to be locked to the value 2 7 c* below about 45 K, and to be the same as at ambient pressure above this temperature.…”
Section: ͑5͒supporting
confidence: 79%
“…The only significant difference between the cycloidal structures at low and high values of the pressure is the way the ordering wave vector depends on temperature. The neutron diffraction experiments show that Q stays constant at 2 7 c* below T N Ј at 11.5 and 14 kbar, 15 in contrast to the rapid variation, by about 20%, shown by Q at ambient pressure. Hence, the only explanation for the deficiency of the theory at low pressure is that ⌫ u in Eq.…”
Section: ͑5͒mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1b presents the results of scans made along [0,0,L] in order to determine the ordering wave vectors at various pressures. We include the results of our experiments performed on PRISMA together with results reported by Kawano et al [5]. Our results from PRISMA demonstrate self-consistency in two experiments, and reveal only a modest change in the wave vector at the transition shown in Figure 1a between 0.5 and 3.5 kbar.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…Neutron diffraction studies of the magnetic structure by Kawano, et al [15,16] found at 1.15 and 1.4 GPa pressure that the transition to the ferromagnetic conical structure is completely suppressed with the elliptical cycloidal structure persisting down to 4.5 K. The CAM antiferromagnetic ordering decreased from 84 K at ambient pressure to 82 K at 1.4 GPa pressure while the cycloidal structure at 1.4 GPa was initially observable at 46 K. The suppression of the low-temperature ferromagnetic conical structure under pressure was confirmed by another neutron diffraction study [17] at 6.0 K which suggested at pressures as low as 0.5 GPa that the conical phase is destroyed. Other studies of the pressure-vs.-temperature phase diagrams are based on a very limited number of pressure-dependent resistivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%