1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(99)00003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-pressure pyrolysis and CO2-gasification of coal maceral concentrates: conversions and char combustion reactivities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolating resinites from coals in sufficient quantities for experimentation, however, is usually difficult. Our previous work on coal constituents ( macerals )2–5 has been confined to the broader, less specific but more accessible coal fractions: vitrinites, inertinites and liptinites, where liptinites include, among others, resinites as a subgroup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolating resinites from coals in sufficient quantities for experimentation, however, is usually difficult. Our previous work on coal constituents ( macerals )2–5 has been confined to the broader, less specific but more accessible coal fractions: vitrinites, inertinites and liptinites, where liptinites include, among others, resinites as a subgroup.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as is shown in Figure 1, as increasing of inertinite content in coal (Table 1), the sample pyrolysis reaction rate decreases. This probably is due to the fact that inertinite, which contains more aromatic structure units, cannot be opened easily at lower pyrolysis temperature so that their reaction required an induction period (Megaritis et al, 1999). On the other hand, with an increase of oxygen content in coal (Table 1), the gasification reaction rate increases, which may be because with the oxygen content increasing in coal, the surface oxygen increases and leads to an activity site, and carbon-oxygen complex increases (Zhuang et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al (2004) investigated the effect of pyrolysis time on the gasification reactivity of char with CO 2 and found that a longer pyrolysis time led to lower reactivity of a char and this effect leveled off as pyrolysis time increased. Moreover, the pore structure of coal or char (Kasaoka et al, 1987;Liu et al, 2000), reaction ambience (Fushimi et al, 2003;Roberts and Harris, 2007), and petrographic component (Megaritis et al, 1999;Sun et al, 2004;Zhuang et al, 1996) have also a remarkable effect on coal gasification reactivity. Mineral matter in coals has been known to influence gasification reactivity because of the presence of catalytically active components (Kyotani et al, 1993;Lemaignen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Sun et al [14] compared the structural variations of the macerals before and after pyrolysis and found that vitrinite led to the yield of more aliphatic C-H and lowered aromaticity than inertinite. It is reported [13,16] that at a short gasification residence time (10 s), the conversion is in the order of liptinite> vitrinite> inertinite, while at a long residence time (200 s), the extent of gasification was found to be inertinite> vitrinite>liptinite. Moreover, Sun et al [17] conducted CO2 gasification of vitrinite char and inertinite char in a pressurized thermobalance at a temperature up to 950 ºC and reported that the vitrinite char was more reactive than the inertinite char with or without a catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, experimental studies on the structural transformation of macerals and the change in chemical reactivity during pyrolysis/gasification have attracted significant attention [13][14][15][16][17][18]. For example, Sun et al [14] compared the structural variations of the macerals before and after pyrolysis and found that vitrinite led to the yield of more aliphatic C-H and lowered aromaticity than inertinite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%