2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/950/4/042001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High pressure spectrofluorimetry – a tool to determine protein-ligand binding volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several techniques that are capable of determining the volume of protein–ligand binding: the fluorescent pressure shift assay (PressureFluor, FPSA) (Toleikis et al ., 2011, 2016; Skvarnavičius et al ., 2017), vibrating tube densitometry(Barbosa et al ., 2003; Son et al ., 2012; Toleikis et al ., 2016), and the high-pressure NMR (Wilton et al ., 2009; Roche et al ., 2012; Toleikis et al ., 2016). They can determine the change of system volume and compressibility caused by the bound ligand.…”
Section: Assays To Determine Small Molecule Inhibitor Interaction Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several techniques that are capable of determining the volume of protein–ligand binding: the fluorescent pressure shift assay (PressureFluor, FPSA) (Toleikis et al ., 2011, 2016; Skvarnavičius et al ., 2017), vibrating tube densitometry(Barbosa et al ., 2003; Son et al ., 2012; Toleikis et al ., 2016), and the high-pressure NMR (Wilton et al ., 2009; Roche et al ., 2012; Toleikis et al ., 2016). They can determine the change of system volume and compressibility caused by the bound ligand.…”
Section: Assays To Determine Small Molecule Inhibitor Interaction Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015); Skvarnavičius et al . (2017). However, there is relatively little data available in the literature on any protein–ligand system, not mentioning the CA, and it is difficult to judge yet if these approaches will be useful in the design of ligands with desired binding properties.…”
Section: Assays To Determine Small Molecule Inhibitor Interaction Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained Δ V b values of the CA I and CA II interaction with the ligands were within the range of −22 to −28 mL/mol. The binding volume of −32 mL/mol of the CA I interaction with the other compound bearing a primary sulfonamide group in its structureacetazolamidewas determined previously by a fluorescent pressure shift assay . Acetazolamide has a higher affinity toward CA I and more negative Δ V b than structurally similar compounds 1 and 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The binding volume of −32 mL/mol of the CA I interaction with the other compound bearing a primary sulfonamide group in its structure—acetazolamide—was determined previously by a fluorescent pressure shift assay. 61 Acetazolamide has a higher affinity toward CA I 40 and more negative Δ V b than structurally similar compounds 1 and 2 . These results were compatible with previous findings showing correlations between protein–ligand binding volumes and affinities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The deep oceans on earth are populated by many organisms that are constantly exposed to high hydrostatic pressures (HHP), reaching values even beyond 1000 bar (100 MPa) at the deepest ocean trenches and subseafloor region. , Hence, knowledge about high hydrostatic pressure effects on biological systems is also fundamental for our understanding of life being exposed to such harsh conditions and of the physical limits of life in general. The molecular effects of pressure on binding equilibria are still largely unknown, however, and the literature on pressure effects on ligand-binding reactions is still scarce. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%