2019
DOI: 10.1002/ygh2.363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of antibodies to infliximab and their relation to clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients

Abstract: Summary Background Antibodies to infliximab (ATI) can complicate infliximab (IFX) treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Aims To identify a clinically relevant threshold for ATI using a drug‐tolerant assay and to clarify factors for ATI development and their relation to clinical outcomes. Methods A cohort study of all IBD patients receiving IFX from May 2016 to April 2017 at a tertiary referral centre. Clinical data and serial therapeutic drug monitoring (at every infusion after the first) wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may seem to be self‐fulfilling prophecy that by proactively monitoring drug levels and antibodies in biological therapy, physicians can achieve better disease control . However, even the most obvious treatment propositions need to be demonstrated by a prospective study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may seem to be self‐fulfilling prophecy that by proactively monitoring drug levels and antibodies in biological therapy, physicians can achieve better disease control . However, even the most obvious treatment propositions need to be demonstrated by a prospective study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even the most obvious treatment propositions need to be demonstrated by a prospective study. In the previous issue of GastroHep, Tun et al demonstrated that there is a high prevalence of positive antibodies to infliximab (ATI) post‐induction and is associated with a high rate of rapid treatment failure . In this issue, McGettigan et al conducted a prospective cohort study following the clinical course of two groups of patients, one with reactive monitoring and the other with proactive drug monitoring …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%