Objective: to compare the terms, definitions and measurement methods developed by the IETA group with the ultrasound criteria of chronic endometritis (CE) used in Russia.Material and methods. A retrospective cohort study of 158 reproductive age women with clinical and laboratory diagnosis of CE was carried out. Sonographic examination was performed in the early or middle proliferative phase (cycle day 4–10 days) with the use of Affiniti70 ultrasound system (Philips, the Netherlands) with a multifrequency 3D endocavitary probe. Uterine corpus volume, endometrial thickness and volume were measured, followed by percentage endometrial/uterine volume ratio calculation, the so-called adjusted endometrial volume. Qualitative analysis of grayscale imaging included assessment of endometrial structure and echogenicity; closure or separation of the endometrial layers; contour of endometrial midline; the presence of acoustic artifacts, such as reverberation in the presence of gas or liquid in the uterine cavity, described by a number of authors. Relevant IETA descriptions were searched when assessing all qualitative CE features. In parallel, a qualitative score analysis proposed by the IETA group was carried out.Timely preoperative diagnosis of endometrioic cyst (endometrioma), as well as deep endometriosis remains relevant. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic value of ultrasound in patients with endometriomas and assess the combination of them with other foci of external genital endometriosis. The study based on retrospective analysis of a date of 95 patients with ultrasound signs of ovarian endometriomas, who underwent examination in MedicoProfi LLC – Borisov Medical and Diagnostic Clinic (Krasnoyarsk) during the period from January 2019 to October 2023. All of patients underwent surgery , followed by morphological evaluation. In the vast majority of cases, it was possible to detect a combination of endometriomas with one or more foci of deep endometriosis. Superficial peritoneal endometriosis and adhesions were found on surgery in all cases when endometriomas appeared isolated on ultrasound. The results of the study showed: endometriomas combined with deep endometriosis in 96.8% of cases. Thus, ultrasound detection of endometrioma is a very reliable sign of deep endometriosis presence. The “kissing ovaries” symptom in bilateral endometriomas can be considered as an absolutely reliable sign of the uterosacral ligaments endometriosis with specificity of 100% and positive predictive value of 100%. The presence of the “kissing ovaries” sign should be depicted in the conclusion of the ultrasound protocol, since it highly suggestive to obliteration of the pouch of Douglas and involvement of adjacent organs (fallopian tubes, intestines, ureters, etc.) in the endometrioid infiltrates, which is extremely important for the surgery planning, as well as in patients with infertility. There is an obvious need to introduce the extended pelvic ultrasound protocol to the diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected endometriosis, which will more accurately describe the disease extension.Results. The comparative analysis of endometrium description in CE indicates a similar measurement technique for endometrial and intrauterine lesions thickness, both proposed by the IETA group and used in our country. Most of the IETA descriptors for qualitative ultrasound findings may be used in CE diagnosis. However, there are no some significant ultrasound features for identifying the inflammation, such as marked and partially or completely thickened midline, as well as gas focuses within the endometrium or in the uterine cavity, in IETA description.Conclusion. Terminology standardization allows compare the results and perform multicenter studies followed by meta-analysis for the diagnosis of chronic endometritis, if researchers use the similar descriptors.
