2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High prevalence of dysfunctional, asymmetrical, and painful movement in elite junior Australian Football players assessed using the Functional Movement Screen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The hurdle step, in‐line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, and rotary stability subtests assess for movement asymmetry. Fuller et al reported a high percentage (65%) of elite junior Australian football players demonstrated at least one asymmetrical movement during FMS testing. Moreover, we demonstrated that the presence of ≥2 asymmetrical FMS subtests was associated with a threefold (Hazard ratio = 3.7; Relative risk = 2.8) increase in the risk of injury that caused a missed game in 237 elite junior male Australian football players .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The hurdle step, in‐line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, and rotary stability subtests assess for movement asymmetry. Fuller et al reported a high percentage (65%) of elite junior Australian football players demonstrated at least one asymmetrical movement during FMS testing. Moreover, we demonstrated that the presence of ≥2 asymmetrical FMS subtests was associated with a threefold (Hazard ratio = 3.7; Relative risk = 2.8) increase in the risk of injury that caused a missed game in 237 elite junior male Australian football players .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The subjects who scored ≤14 in performing functional movement tests were attributed to Group 1 and were considered to have a greater chance of trauma (the composite score for women was 13.00 (12.41-12.82) and that for men was 13.00 (11.99-12.81)). The subjects who scored ≥15 were attributed to Group 2 and were considered to have a lower chance of trauma (the composite score for women was 15.00 (15.47-16.17) and that for men was 16.00 (15.56-16.14)) [27][28][29]33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects performed the following movements: deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up and rotary stability. Following many authors [27][28][29], the reference point is as follows: subjects with the score ≤14 have a greater chance of trauma (Group 1), and those with the score ≥15 have a lower chance of trauma (Group 2). In case of different evaluation scores for the left and the right body sides, the subjects were attributed to the groups according to the lower score [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower FMS scores are found to be related to higher injury rates in sports such as soccer, ice hockey, Australian football, rugby, and running (8)(9)(10). Moreover, the normative values of the FMS scores are established in lesser populated sports as Hurling and Gaelic football (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%