High-Quality Publications in Russia: A Literature Review on How to Influence University Researchers

Abstract

Introduction. Under the growing role of university science in Russia, special attention is paid to improving the quality of scientific publications of Russian university researchers in leading international and Russian journals. To understand the direction of scientific discourse on this issue, the authors explored scientific publications that address the tools to influence Russian university researchers to publish in journals indexed by Scopus or Web of Science. Materials and Methods. Articles found up to 2022 in the Scopus or Web of Science databases were included in this review. A systematic approach based on PRISMA recommendations and the qualitative content analysis method were applied. The review sample covered 14 articles. Results. The review results showed that the research topic is in its infancy, but there is interest in it. Three stakeholders were identified on this topic: the researcher, government bodies, and university management. The most mentioned tools of influence were: for the “researcher” stakeholder – the propensity for scientific work and participation in scientific projects, for the “government bodies” stakeholder – grants and government policy pressure, for the “university management” stakeholder – implementation of the rating system/scientometrics, initiation of incentive payments, support for collaboration, and competition stimulation. According to the review results, the main shortcomings of the system of influencing Russian researchers were bureaucratic management, scarce funding, pressure to publish, “academic capitalism”, and restrictions on academic freedoms. Most authors of the review sample commented that a number of tools to influence Russian researchers need to be improved or even replaced. Discussion and Conclusion. This review contributes to improving research management in Russia, highlighting the features of stakeholders to influence Russian researchers for high-quality publications, the main shortcomings of the system of influence and recommendations to address these shortcomings.

What is Behind the Shine? The Dark Side of Research Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework

“…Logically, Scientometrics and Research Evaluation were identified as primary publishing sources (Figure 3), as the topic of RE fits closely within the scope of these journals. The great interest of Russian authors in RE in recent years (Figure 4) stems from the intro of a country-specific research evaluation system for prioritizing science [33], [38], [48], [54]. The increased interest of authors from the UK, New Zealand and the USA (Figure 4) can be explained by the constant improvements in their RE systems introduced there long ago [17], [44], [47].…”

Striving for High-Quality Publications: Motivational Profiles of Management Within a Bulgarian University Cluster

“…In addition, other papers [12], [22], [23] also indicate factors driving management to influence researchers to increase WoS/Scopus publications, but mentioning them in a different context and without explicitly defining them as "motivational factors". University ranks, grants, prestige and "publish-orperish" pressure are most commonly mentioned.…”

“…Among the latter, the university management is of great importance. It is defined as a key internal stakeholder in the scientific literature [11], thanks to the rich set of tools at its disposal to influence researchers [12].…”

Critical Criteria for Evaluation of Scientific Research Activity in Science Direct

“…Водещите университети демонстрират високи постижения предимно в изследователската дейност (Meek & Davies, 2009). Преподавателите на тези университети се считат за по-ефективни (Lambovska & Raitskaya, 2022). Повишаването на ефективността на научноизследователската дейност води до увеличаване на имиджа на университета, което означава по-добри възможности за привличане и задържане на висококвалифициран академичен персонал, подобряване на разпознаваемостта на университета и увеличаване на кандидатстудентите.…”