2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3665-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-rate activated sludge processes for municipal wastewater treatment: the effect of food waste addition and hydraulic limits of the system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental site was a WWTP using activated sludge and chlorination routinely applied in municipal wastewater treatment. 54,55 RNA is susceptible to hydrolysis in the presence of hydroxyl groups and under the alkaline conditions of chlorination. 56 However, the present study demonstrated that RNA might not be completely degraded and might be discharged into the river.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental site was a WWTP using activated sludge and chlorination routinely applied in municipal wastewater treatment. 54,55 RNA is susceptible to hydrolysis in the presence of hydroxyl groups and under the alkaline conditions of chlorination. 56 However, the present study demonstrated that RNA might not be completely degraded and might be discharged into the river.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to introduce an effective strategy for COD removal during the first stage of municipal wastewater treatment. This can be achieved, for example, by a High Rate Activated Sludge (HRAS) process, the main objective of which is to increase the recovery of organic matter from wastewater [24]. The efficiency of COD removal in the HRAS process is usually >50%, however, such technology is not dedicated for nitrogen removal [25,26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the PSD in HRAS processes is important because the size of the sludge particles, through its effect on bioflocculation efficiency, is expected to affect COD recovery efficiency in such processes. 30,56 The particle size distribution (PSD) for the activated sludge flocs in the HL-MSBR at different OLRs is presented in Fig. 3b.…”
Section: Effect Of the Olr On Eps Production And Psd And Their Role I...mentioning
confidence: 99%