2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-rate mode II fracture toughness testing of polymer matrix composites – A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the adhesive was stronger in both load cases than the CFRP. The fact that the bonded specimens failed in a similar manner at both experimental loading rates tends to highlight a rate-dependent effect in the composite material properties, which has also been repeatedly reported and summarized in review articles [41][42][43]. However, a specific layer in which the delamination failure occurred could not be identified.…”
Section: Assessment Of Rate Effects and Failure Modesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This shows that the adhesive was stronger in both load cases than the CFRP. The fact that the bonded specimens failed in a similar manner at both experimental loading rates tends to highlight a rate-dependent effect in the composite material properties, which has also been repeatedly reported and summarized in review articles [41][42][43]. However, a specific layer in which the delamination failure occurred could not be identified.…”
Section: Assessment Of Rate Effects and Failure Modesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A comprehensive understanding of the laminated composite material’s resistance to interlaminar fracture is essential for product development and material selection. Previous studies on the fracture toughness of composite materials are well-documented in the literature. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experimental studies for the rate effects on mode-II fracture toughness can be found [88] and in a comprehensive review [89], but -just as for the mode-I investigations -there were no unanimous conclusions regarding fracturetoughness rate effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%