2008
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High rate of early virological failure with the once-daily tenofovir/lamivudine/nevirapine combination in naive HIV-1-infected patients

Abstract: In ARV-naive HIV-1-infected patients, the once-daily lamivudine, tenofovirDF and nevirapine regimen resulted in a high rate of early virological failures. The reasons for the failures remain unclear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
37
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Yet 2 small studies comprising less than 42 patients did suggest that the combination of TDF + NVP and emtricitabine or lamivudine (XTC) has higher virologic failure rates than anticipated. [17][18][19] Despite the lack of difference in the primary endpoints between the NVP/TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) and the atazanavir/r + TDF + FTC arms in the ARTEN trial, there were more participants in the NVP arms than the atazanavir/ritonavir arm who discontinued study drugs because of adverse events (13.6% vs. 2.6%) or lack of efficacy (8.4% vs. 1.6%). 11 The 2011 US DHHS guidelines list NVP as an acceptable but not a preferred or an alternative first-line drug and continue to place a warning on combination of NVP and TDF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Yet 2 small studies comprising less than 42 patients did suggest that the combination of TDF + NVP and emtricitabine or lamivudine (XTC) has higher virologic failure rates than anticipated. [17][18][19] Despite the lack of difference in the primary endpoints between the NVP/TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) and the atazanavir/r + TDF + FTC arms in the ARTEN trial, there were more participants in the NVP arms than the atazanavir/ritonavir arm who discontinued study drugs because of adverse events (13.6% vs. 2.6%) or lack of efficacy (8.4% vs. 1.6%). 11 The 2011 US DHHS guidelines list NVP as an acceptable but not a preferred or an alternative first-line drug and continue to place a warning on combination of NVP and TDF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tal hecho fue reportado por Gallant y cols., quienes detectaron 21% de K65R en la combinación de TDF + 3TC que no permitió obtener una adecuada supresión viral 26 . Aunado a esto, se ha evidenciado una fuerte asociación para la selección de K65R con el uso de NVP y sus mutaciones de resistencia Y181C/G y G190A/S [27][28][29][30] . Interesantemente, en el caso de Guatemala, todos los pacientes con K65R tenían antecedente de uso, además de TDF, al menos uno de los siguientes: NVP, d4T, AZT o ddI; sumado a esto, más de dos tercios tenían al menos una de estas mutaciones Y181C/G o G190A/S.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Thus, the K65R point mutation commonly causes intermediate resistance to tenofovir (TDF), ABC, ddI, 3TC and FTC (Table 2), low level resistance to d4T, and increased susceptibility to AZT (Antinori et al, 2007;Lanier et al, 2004b). There is a body of evidence suggesting that K65R mutation occurs more commonly in low-income countries when patients with nonsubtype B HIV-1 strains are treated with d4T/ddI and d4T/3TC Hawkins et al, 2009) or TDF/3TC (Rey et al, 2009). In comparison to K65R, L74V point mutation causes intermediate resistance to ddI and ABC, and a slight increase in susceptibility to AZT and TDF (Rhee et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Point Mutations Associated With Resistance To Nrtismentioning
confidence: 99%