2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High rate production of antihydrogen

Abstract: We show that antihydrogen production is the dominant process when mixing antiprotons and positrons in the ATHENA apparatus, and that the initial production rate exceeds 300 Hz, decaying to 30 Hz within 10 s. A fraction of 65% of all observed annihilations is due to antihydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though all the distributions are broadened by the uncertainty in the vertex reconstruction, it is clear that two different structures are merged in cold mixing case, while in hot mixing just one appears. For the cold mixing, besides the annihilations on the trap wall situated at r = 1.25 cm due mainly toH (as shown in [12]) and having a relatively wider z-distribution [10], there are some annihilations situated at smaller r and with a very sharp z-distribution (see also Fig.5b). For hot mixing only the latter are present, though their axial distribution is broader, as is the radial distribution (see also Fig.4a,b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though all the distributions are broadened by the uncertainty in the vertex reconstruction, it is clear that two different structures are merged in cold mixing case, while in hot mixing just one appears. For the cold mixing, besides the annihilations on the trap wall situated at r = 1.25 cm due mainly toH (as shown in [12]) and having a relatively wider z-distribution [10], there are some annihilations situated at smaller r and with a very sharp z-distribution (see also Fig.5b). For hot mixing only the latter are present, though their axial distribution is broader, as is the radial distribution (see also Fig.4a,b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in [12] that, when the e + cloud was kept at the trap environment cryogenic temperature of ∼ 15 K (a situation called "cold mixing" hereafter), annihilations were mainly due toH, even if some annihilations near the trap axis were present (see also Fig.1a). On the contrary, when the e + cloud was heated (by a radio-frequency drive applied to an electrode of the trap [13,14]) to a temperature, T e , of several thousand K (about 8000 K for the data reported here, which we call "hot mixing" hereafter)H formation was strongly suppressed [15] andps annihilated mainly without formingH (see also Fig.1b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key point is that the antihydrogen formation will happen within a short time (of the order of 1 µs). This "pulsed production scheme" strongly differs from the existing schemes where the antihydrogen is produced during long time intervals (seconds in the ATHENA experiment) [8].…”
Section: Pulsed Cold Antihydrogen Formationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Antihydrogen formation by three-body recombination is a well-established method that has been demonstrated to create H at high rate [17]. As mentioned above, AEGIS will make use of an alternative technique which involves Ps as precursor [18].…”
Section: Production Of Antihydrogen By Resonant Charge Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%