2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3262128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Reliability Load Recognition in Home Energy Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the REFIT dataset, the difference between RELM and ELM reveals a 0.36% accuracy advantage for the RELM model. This advantage is the same for RELM compared to the SVM of the state-of-the-art system proposed in Cabral et al [7]. For the REDD dataset, RELM's advantage over SVM is 0.21%.…”
Section: Major Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the REFIT dataset, the difference between RELM and ELM reveals a 0.36% accuracy advantage for the RELM model. This advantage is the same for RELM compared to the SVM of the state-of-the-art system proposed in Cabral et al [7]. For the REDD dataset, RELM's advantage over SVM is 0.21%.…”
Section: Major Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Our method provides an ultra-low training time of 0.082 s with the REFIT database, less than the SVM of the technique reported in Cabral et. al [7], which has a time of 0.469 s. This result means that the proposed approach is approximately 5.72 times faster than the competitor, representing a time saving of 82.52% compared to the competitor. Concerning ELM, the proposed approach is 2.33 times faster and saves approximately 57.07% of the time.…”
Section: Major Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations