2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2021.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution 3-D GPR applied in the diagnostic of the detachment and cracks in pre-Hispanic mural paintings at “Templo Rojo”, Cacaxtla, Tlaxcala, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the field of preventive heritage conservation, the use of Non-Destructive Tests (NDT) has proven to be a necessary resource for the protection of cultural heritage, ranging from decay diagnosis to monitoring (Tejedor et al, 2022). Procedures, such as Damage Mapping (Sánchez-Aparicio et al, 2018), measurement of C-Shore Hardness (Blasco López & Alejandre Sánchez, 2013) and Superficial Humidity (Battini & Vecchiattini, 2018), Infrared Thermography (IRT) (Moropoulou et al, 2018), Digital Image Processing (DIP) (Galantucci & Fatiguso, 2019), Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) (Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2021) and monitoring of ambient conditions (Merello et al, 2013), provide reliable means of assessing damage to heritage assets. Moreover, these methods function without compromising their structural condition and help to identify hidden targets that are invisible on the surface (Biscarini et al, 2020;Diz-Mellado et al, 2021).…”
Section: State Of Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the field of preventive heritage conservation, the use of Non-Destructive Tests (NDT) has proven to be a necessary resource for the protection of cultural heritage, ranging from decay diagnosis to monitoring (Tejedor et al, 2022). Procedures, such as Damage Mapping (Sánchez-Aparicio et al, 2018), measurement of C-Shore Hardness (Blasco López & Alejandre Sánchez, 2013) and Superficial Humidity (Battini & Vecchiattini, 2018), Infrared Thermography (IRT) (Moropoulou et al, 2018), Digital Image Processing (DIP) (Galantucci & Fatiguso, 2019), Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) (Ortega-Ramírez et al, 2021) and monitoring of ambient conditions (Merello et al, 2013), provide reliable means of assessing damage to heritage assets. Moreover, these methods function without compromising their structural condition and help to identify hidden targets that are invisible on the surface (Biscarini et al, 2020;Diz-Mellado et al, 2021).…”
Section: State Of Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to set the continuous acquisition time of each electromagnetic wave, that is, the time window. The time window should be set according to the maximum detection depth and the electromagnetic wave velocity in the medium, as shown in Equation (8). At the same time, it should be slightly larger than the two-way travel time of electromagnetic waves.…”
Section: Parameters Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a technology that uses high-frequency radio electromagnetic waves to perform non-destructive testing of targets in the medium [2][3][4]. Owing to its advantages of high resolution, high efficiency, intuitive results, and non-destructive nature, it is widely used in geological exploration [5], road surface inspection [6], underground pipeline detection [7], archaeological detection [8,9], etc. In addition, GPR is also used in the detection of tunnel linings [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, with this type of GPR scanning, the mapping of a subsurface area of interest is achieved, providing information about the location, depth, and orientation of the internal reflectors. Today, most of the processing software with which the geo-radar systems are equipped to provide the possibility of displaying the 3D data in various ways-such as in the form of horizontal sections at defined time ranges that correspond to depths parallel to the recording level, or isosurfaces-these are interpolated surfaces that represent subsurface points with a constant reflection coefficient or amplitude [188][189][190][191].…”
Section: Ground-penetrating Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%