2001
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0159:hraroo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Airborne Radar Observations of Mammatus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
19
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
12
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1b-d). This observation is consistent with previous literature describing cloud-base inversions (Clayton 1911;Hartmann 1920;Schneider 1920;Clarke 1962;Stith 1995;Winstead et al 2001;Schultz et al 2006). In M4, a superadiabatic layer also forms around 600 hPa at the base of the greatest cooling, which is a feature also observed in some previous soundings (Fig.…”
Section: Modification Of Soundings By Mammatussupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b-d). This observation is consistent with previous literature describing cloud-base inversions (Clayton 1911;Hartmann 1920;Schneider 1920;Clarke 1962;Stith 1995;Winstead et al 2001;Schultz et al 2006). In M4, a superadiabatic layer also forms around 600 hPa at the base of the greatest cooling, which is a feature also observed in some previous soundings (Fig.…”
Section: Modification Of Soundings By Mammatussupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The presence of an inversion at the anvil base in Fig. 1b is consistent with some other soundings associated with mammatus (e.g., Clayton 1911;Hartmann 1920;Schneider 1920;Clarke 1962;Stith 1995;Winstead et al 2001;Schultz et al 2006).…”
Section: Observed Soundings Used To Initialize Modelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Respective maximum downdrafts are 21.8 and 1.9 m s 21 . These values are in the range of those seen in mammatus lobes by radar (Winstead et al 2001;Kollias et al 2005) and aircraft (Stith 1995), although observed updraft velocities are weaker. This difference can be explained by velocities in measurements applying only to the cloudy mammatus lobes themselves whereas model results apply more to the cloud-free regions that surround the descending mammatus lobes.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Mammatus clouds are among the more intriguing of atmospheric phenomena for their dramatic visual appearance, especially when the sun is low on the horizon and the contrast between pouches is at its highest and most colorful. Normally, mammatus lobes are smooth and regularly spaced, protruding downward from cloud base in visible and radar imagery (Martner 1995;Winstead et al 2001;Schultz et al 2006). Here we see mammatus-like structures that protrude instead upward from the cloud top.…”
Section: Discussion: Formation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%