2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution delineation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds in a dipping, fractured mudstone: Depth- and strata-dependent spatial variability from rock-core sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organic carbon on fracture surfaces and within the rock matrix (primarily in sedimentary rocks) can further extend the time frame associated with the "back" diffusion because of sorption (Allen-King et al 2002;Huang et al 2003), which can significantly increase the CE mass within the rock matrix. In fractured sedimentary rocks, the matrix porosity can be greater than 10% of the rock volume (Dorsch and Katsube 1999;Bloomfield et al 2001), whereas the fracture porosity may only constitute, at most, a few percent of the rock volume (Zuber and Motyka 1994;Moench 1995) resulting in the majority of the CE retained within the rock matrix (Sterling et al 2005;Goode et al 2014). Injecting remediation amendments usually will cause dramatic decreases of CE concentrations within connected permeable fractures, but will not necessarily achieve thorough biological treatment of both mobile and immobile groundwater (Drew and DeFlaun 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organic carbon on fracture surfaces and within the rock matrix (primarily in sedimentary rocks) can further extend the time frame associated with the "back" diffusion because of sorption (Allen-King et al 2002;Huang et al 2003), which can significantly increase the CE mass within the rock matrix. In fractured sedimentary rocks, the matrix porosity can be greater than 10% of the rock volume (Dorsch and Katsube 1999;Bloomfield et al 2001), whereas the fracture porosity may only constitute, at most, a few percent of the rock volume (Zuber and Motyka 1994;Moench 1995) resulting in the majority of the CE retained within the rock matrix (Sterling et al 2005;Goode et al 2014). Injecting remediation amendments usually will cause dramatic decreases of CE concentrations within connected permeable fractures, but will not necessarily achieve thorough biological treatment of both mobile and immobile groundwater (Drew and DeFlaun 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation is conducted in the Lockatong mudstone underlying the former Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC), West Trenton, NJ (Figure 1), which is a site of groundwater contamination with TCE (Lacombe 2000). Goode et al (2014) and Tiedeman et al (2017b) used geologic, geophysical, hydraulic, and biogeochemical information to identify groundwater flow paths through permeable fractures and the distribution of CE in the mobile groundwater in fractures and the immobile groundwater in the rock matrix. Investigations of rock core at the site indicate the majority of the CE mass is resident in the rock matrix .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional information on contamination at NAWC is given in Lacombe (2000), Lacombe and Burton (2010), and Goode et al (2014). The persistent elevated TCE concentrations are likely caused by dissolution of DNAPL TCE and diffusion of aqueous TCE from the rock matrix to permeable fractures.…”
Section: Highly Weathered Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix porosities can vary from less than 1% to greater than 3% in igneous and metamorphic rocks (Ohlsson and Neretnieks 1995;Wood et al 1996), and can be as high as 40% in sedimentary rocks (Dorsch and Katsube 1999;Bloomfield et al 2001). In sedimentary rock with relatively large matrix porosities, this diffusion can cause the majority of contaminant mass to reside in the rock matrix (Lawrence et al 1990;Sterling et al 2005;Sale et al 2008;Goode et al 2014;NAS 2015). Contaminants diffuse from fractures into the rock matrix when concentrations are higher in the fractures, a condition that commonly occurs prior to remediation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires high-resolution data and unbiased samples of the contaminant distribution (as demonstrated by e.g. Parker et al, 2006, Goode et al, 2014. To date most contaminant investigations and monitoring in limestone/chalk and other fractured rock aquifers have been based on water sampling from traditional open boreholes or screened wells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%