2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution documentation, 3-D modeling and analysis of “desert kites”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant here is another point, namely the high‐resolution documentation of large sites in harsh environments. Currently, all researchers are using Google Earth images and aerial photography, but using Lidar scanners and photogrammetry for 3D‐model building and ensuing analyses will take us some further steps forwards (Arav et al ., ; in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant here is another point, namely the high‐resolution documentation of large sites in harsh environments. Currently, all researchers are using Google Earth images and aerial photography, but using Lidar scanners and photogrammetry for 3D‐model building and ensuing analyses will take us some further steps forwards (Arav et al ., ; in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual scans were acquired in a local reference frame, requiring transformation into a common one—a procedure termed registration (Dold and Brenner, 2006; Buckley et al, 2008; Barnea and Filin, 2010; Arav and Filin, 2012; Arav et al, 2015; Liang et al, 2016). Our registration practice involved deployment of artificial targets—here, reflectors in the scene as tie elements (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on propagation of the variances, the detection limit was defined as mΔ=2mz where m z is the accuracy estimate of the laser scanning data. We define the threshold based on the estimated accuracy of range data (Arav and Filin, 2012; Arav et al, 2015). Considering the ±2‐mm surface accuracy and 95% confidence interval, the minimal detection level was set to ±5.6 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume was then estimated via area of each plot times the times the elevation difference between the fluvial terrace baseline to that of the top of the agricultural one. Soil loss volume since abandon- ment was measured via polyhedral volume summation (Arav et al, 2015).…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual soil loss rate was carried at gully heads, from where most soil is removed in the short term. Due to the complexity of the erosive pattern within the gully, soil-loss volume was measured first by delineation of the new eroded part at the head, and then by computation polyhedral volume summation (Arav et al, 2015).…”
Section: Erosion Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%