2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14215441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution Drone Images Show That the Distribution of Mussels Depends on Microhabitat Features of Intertidal Rocky Shores

Abstract: In this study, we used orthomosaics and a digital surface model (DSM) generated from drone surveys to (1) characterize the distribution of mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) aggregations at high resolution (centimeters), and (2) evaluate the role of topographic features, intertidal height, slope, and orientation angle in determining mussel distribution on two rocky shores oriented differently on both sides of a beach on the French Brittany coast. We first developed and tested a mussel visualization index (MVI)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also considered transect-specific characteristics (the same for all localities along the transect): Distdistance (by the midline of the inlet) between the transect and the settlement closest to the river mouth (R+0.5), m; Widthdistance from the uppermost to the deepest sampling localities within the same transect, m (roughly proportional to the width of the mussel belt on a given stretch of shore) and Expshore exposure (north or south). These parameters are related to factors considered as the most important for mussels (Seed and Suchanek, 1992;Barbosa et al, 2022). Depth, Bottom, Kelp and Cov were assessed in parallel with mussel sampling in 2009-2010.…”
Section: Environmental Parameters Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also considered transect-specific characteristics (the same for all localities along the transect): Distdistance (by the midline of the inlet) between the transect and the settlement closest to the river mouth (R+0.5), m; Widthdistance from the uppermost to the deepest sampling localities within the same transect, m (roughly proportional to the width of the mussel belt on a given stretch of shore) and Expshore exposure (north or south). These parameters are related to factors considered as the most important for mussels (Seed and Suchanek, 1992;Barbosa et al, 2022). Depth, Bottom, Kelp and Cov were assessed in parallel with mussel sampling in 2009-2010.…”
Section: Environmental Parameters Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each region, an orthophoto mosaic, a Digital Elevation Model (DEM), a terrain roughness index raster image and a classified mosaic based on the following land-cover classes: water, sand, rocks, mussels, algae and urban, were obtained. Rotatory-wing UAVs were also used for automating coral reef assessment [15], fauna monitoring and shark surveillance [16], sensitive marine habitat mapping and classification [17], underwater benthic monitoring and mapping [18], intertidal mudflat mapping [19], mussel distribution [20], and macroalgae monitoring [21][22][23], among others, but all of them follow the same pattern: either the resolution is low or the study area is small. Due to the great length of the Galician coastline (more than 1500 km [24]) and the short time of low tides for data collection, this work proposes the use of a small fixed-wind electric UAV for this type of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%