2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution Electrical Resistivity Tomography monitoring of a tracer test in a confined aquifer

Abstract: A permanent geoelectrical subsurface imaging system has been installed at a contaminated land site to monitor changes in groundwater quality after the completion of a remediation programme. Since the resistivities of earth materials are sensitive to the presence of contaminants and their break-down products, 4-dimensional resistivity imaging can act as a surrogate monitoring technology for tracking and visualising changes in contaminant concentrations at much higher spatial and temporal resolution than manual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Monitoring at the site is based around the ALERT (Automated time-Lapse Electrical Resistivity Tomography) survey concept Ogilvy et al, 2009;Wilkinson et al, 2010a). The ALERT system provides the full capability for remote measurement, storage and transmission of geoelectrical data.…”
Section: Methodology Monitoring Instrumentation (Alert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring at the site is based around the ALERT (Automated time-Lapse Electrical Resistivity Tomography) survey concept Ogilvy et al, 2009;Wilkinson et al, 2010a). The ALERT system provides the full capability for remote measurement, storage and transmission of geoelectrical data.…”
Section: Methodology Monitoring Instrumentation (Alert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most ERT monitoring experiments, the 1-2 h required to record each suite of data is short compared to the movement of the tracer (on the order of days), thus justifying the common assumption that significant changes do not occur during data acquisition (Binley et al, 2002;Kemna et al, 2002;Cassiani et al, 2006;Wilkinson et al, 2010). However, for experiments in fast dynamic environments, such as ours, the timing of each measurement has to be taken into account (Day-Lewis et al, 2003).…”
Section: Preprocessing the Ert Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical monitoring of salt-tracer tests using ERT has been successful in the laboratory (Slater et al, 2000) and in the field using 2D and 3D crosshole techniques (Singha and Gorelick, 2005;Wilkinson et al, 2010). Studies in which a salt tracer has been monitored from the surface have so far mainly been restricted to measurements along single or several 2D lines (Cassiani et al, 2006;Monego et al, 2010;Ward et al, 2010;Cardenas and Markowski, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-lapse geophysical surveys have been undertaken for other applications. For example, electrical resistivity surveys have been used to monitor active landslides (Wilkinson et al, 2010a), toxic leachate migration (Rucker et al, 2011), hydrological infiltration (Cassiani et al, 2009), aquifer exploitation (Chambers et al, 2007), and contaminated land (Wilkinson et al, 2010b). Time-lapse ground penetrating radar (GPR) has also been used for fluid migration studies (Birken and Versteeg, 2000), but GPR techniques typically do not have sufficient penetration to monitor mine-related subsidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%