2020
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution, field approaches for assessing pain: Ecological Momentary Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are important because they contribute to a growing body of literature highlighting the need to consider multiple dimensions of the pain experience beyond average pain scores 72 . EMAs allow for the exploration of various dimensions of the pain experience unfolding within-day in the real world, but heterogeneity in methodologies across studies to implement them makes it difficult to compare results across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are important because they contribute to a growing body of literature highlighting the need to consider multiple dimensions of the pain experience beyond average pain scores 72 . EMAs allow for the exploration of various dimensions of the pain experience unfolding within-day in the real world, but heterogeneity in methodologies across studies to implement them makes it difficult to compare results across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Increased pain intensity variability has been shown to be positively associated with pain recall bias 73 . Given the well-known peak-and-end effect 3,37,83 that influences recall bias, measuring pain as a dynamic process in real-time using methodologies such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) offers significant advantages 71,72 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Under the current study design, in both phase 1 and phase 2 studies, we observed no statistically meaningful change in pain in the NoTx arm over many weeks. This is in contrast with meta-analytic results, 31 probably mainly because of repeated assessment of current pain which should diminish recall biases, 10,47,54 as well as inclusion of at least 1 week of baseline pain assessment. If one assumes that NoTx pain does not differ in intensity from initial enrollment, then the placebo effect size can be directly estimated from extant literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Intensive sampling approaches such as EMA have shown significant promise for realtime assessment of pain experiences in participant's daily lives [40,49,51]. The vast majority of research in this area has focused on what is true for individuals on average (i.e., fixed effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-person relationships can be assessed using intensive longitudinal sampling approaches such as Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) that allow for repeated assessments within patient's daily lives via portable devices [40,49,51]. EMA studies have found that momentary increases in pain are associated with concurrent increased NA, and vice versa, across several chronic pain conditions [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%