2011
DOI: 10.1175/2010mwr3224.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution GFS-Based MOS Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts on a 4-km Grid

Abstract: The Meteorological Development Laboratory (MDL) of the National Weather Service (NWS) has developed high-resolution Global Forecast System (GFS)-based model output statistics (MOS) 6-and 12-h quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) guidance on a 4-km grid for the contiguous United States. Geographically regionalized multiple linear regression equations are used to produce probabilistic QPFs (PQPFs) for multiple precipitation exceedance thresholds. Also, several supplementary QPF elements are derived from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As listed in Table 4, the mean TS values from day-1 QPFs by the 2.5-km CReSS for the top-5 cases at the thresholds of 25 mm (near 1 in.) Although not as high as the top-5 cases, they are already much higher than typical values and longterm averages in many places (e.g., Olson et al 1995;Mesinger 1996;Ralph et al 2005;Marchok et al 2007;Tuleya et al 2007;Charba and Samplatsky 2011). The day-2 and day-3 QPFs that started 24 and 48 h earlier register mean TSs of 0.75, 0.73, 0.57, 0.42, and 0.17, and 0.64, 0.57, 0.37, 0.33, and 0.22 at the same thresholds, respectively (cf.…”
Section: A Model Performance For Hazardous and Extreme Eventsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…As listed in Table 4, the mean TS values from day-1 QPFs by the 2.5-km CReSS for the top-5 cases at the thresholds of 25 mm (near 1 in.) Although not as high as the top-5 cases, they are already much higher than typical values and longterm averages in many places (e.g., Olson et al 1995;Mesinger 1996;Ralph et al 2005;Marchok et al 2007;Tuleya et al 2007;Charba and Samplatsky 2011). The day-2 and day-3 QPFs that started 24 and 48 h earlier register mean TSs of 0.75, 0.73, 0.57, 0.42, and 0.17, and 0.64, 0.57, 0.37, 0.33, and 0.22 at the same thresholds, respectively (cf.…”
Section: A Model Performance For Hazardous and Extreme Eventsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Ensemble forecasts of precipitation are replacing single (deterministic) forecasts for extending streamflow predictions beyond 48 hours. However, improvements in the prediction of precipitation have lagged behind the much more significant improvements made by operational NWP models in forecasting many aspects of the largescale circulation [1]. For example, [4] found using the Global Forecast System (GFS) the precipitation total was underestimated and that the spatial distribution of the rainfall was degraded by the resolution of the global model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through operational use, the sources of errors consist of: (1) Z bias including ground clutter, anomalous propagation, signal attenuation, beam blockage, bright band (BB) and variation of the vertical profile of reflectivity (VPR), (2) R bias including changes in the precipitation before reaching the ground and (3) inappropriate Z-R relationships (Villarini and Krajewski, 2010; Charba and * Correspondence: W. Zhang, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. E-mail: zhangwenshengia@hotmail.com Samplatsky, 2011;Shucksmith et al, 2011;Erdin et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%