“…Considering that the orientation of both APTES and antikinesin antibodies leads to anisotropic geometries, 37 we further hypothesized that any kinesin dispensed from the microtubule pen as a pattern to be written onto the anti-kinesin antibodies would not only show an additional increase in local surface roughness at its place of binding, but also a surface dotlike geometry. Our hypothesis is supported by previous reports that showed that single molecules could be imaged using AFM, [17][18][19][20][21] with kinesin molecules in particular being resolved by AFM as individual visible blobs. 17 Indeed, kinesin writing led to an additional increase in surface roughness, i.e., from 1.12 to 4.00 nm for R q and from 1.54 to 5.02 nm for R a for the APTES-glutaraldehyde-antikinesin antibody-kinesin surface relative to the APTESglutaraldehyde-anti-kinesin antibody functionalized surface respectively ( Fig.…”