1997
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.3.9393511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
71
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors defend that the US presents a better spatial resolution then MRI, when studies obtained with more modern devices are compared (14) . This is due to the fact that tissues with few mobile protons emit little or no signal, therefore, tendons internal architecture is not well demonstrated by MRI (8,15) . US also has the advantadge of allowing the study of tendons in a real-time dynamic mode (16)(17)(18) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors defend that the US presents a better spatial resolution then MRI, when studies obtained with more modern devices are compared (14) . This is due to the fact that tissues with few mobile protons emit little or no signal, therefore, tendons internal architecture is not well demonstrated by MRI (8,15) . US also has the advantadge of allowing the study of tendons in a real-time dynamic mode (16)(17)(18) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is operator dependent and does not allow visualization of intraarticular structures such as the labrum, capsule and cartilage and has limited ability to evaluate intraosseous abnormalities. [20][21][22] Therefore, we chose MRI because it enables the acquisition of images in multiple planes within one single examination, offers good anatomical visualization and all structures of the joint may be analyzed (bone, cartilage, tendons, muscle, joints). Given the fact that clinical tests are difficult to perform in SCI individuals, a complementary examination, which identifies all structures from the shoulder, is beneficial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of US include portability, low cost, and lack of contraindications, whereas disadvantages relate to limited assessment of the capsule, labrum, and cartilage as well as the inability to evaluate purely intraosseous abnormalities. The spatial resolution of images obtained with US is higher than that of images obtained with routine MR imaging (28), and patients prefer US examination to MR imaging (29).…”
Section: Methods and Conference Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 97%