2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Resolution In Vivo Identification of miRNA Targets by Halo-Enhanced Ago2 Pull-Down

Abstract: The identification of microRNA (miRNA) targets by Ago2 crosslinking-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) methods has provided major insights into the biology of this important class of non-coding RNAs. However, these methods are technically challenging and not easily applicable to an in vivo setting. To overcome these limitations and facilitate the investigation of miRNA functions in vivo, we have developed a method based on a genetically engineered mouse harboring a conditional Halo-Ago2 allele expressed from the endog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(111 reference statements)
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“… AGenome browser view of the region encompassing miR‐290 and miR‐295/4 MREs (red) within lncRNA‐c1 . Halo‐enhanced AGO2 pull‐down (Li et al , 2020) read density for two independent replicates (between 0–127 is represented in the y ‐axis). BPairwise alignment between miR‐290‐3p (top) and miR‐294‐3p (bottom) and respective predicted miRNA response elements (MRE) within lncRNA‐c1 . Seed‐complementary MRE start position within annotated lncRNA‐c1 transcript is indicated inside parentheses. C GFP‐lncRNA‐c1 expression 24 h following transfection of mESCs with 5, 15 or 30 mM mmu‐miR294‐3p inhibitors (Inhibitor, triangles) or small RNA negative control (NC, squares).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… AGenome browser view of the region encompassing miR‐290 and miR‐295/4 MREs (red) within lncRNA‐c1 . Halo‐enhanced AGO2 pull‐down (Li et al , 2020) read density for two independent replicates (between 0–127 is represented in the y ‐axis). BPairwise alignment between miR‐290‐3p (top) and miR‐294‐3p (bottom) and respective predicted miRNA response elements (MRE) within lncRNA‐c1 . Seed‐complementary MRE start position within annotated lncRNA‐c1 transcript is indicated inside parentheses. C GFP‐lncRNA‐c1 expression 24 h following transfection of mESCs with 5, 15 or 30 mM mmu‐miR294‐3p inhibitors (Inhibitor, triangles) or small RNA negative control (NC, squares).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central band of boxplot represents median, box depicts 25–75 quantiles of distribution, and whiskers represent the 5 th and 95 th quantiles of the distribution. C, DSmall RNA and Poly(A)‐selected RNA sequencing based estimates of the fold difference ( y ‐axis) in (C) miRNA and (D) mRNA expression, respectively, relative to day 0, during a 12 days’ time course ( x ‐axis) following treatment of DTCM23/49XY mESCs with 4‐OHT and consequent loss of DICER function. Points represent the average miRNA or mRNA expression and error bars the standard deviation based on three independent biological replicates. ECumulative distribution plot of the fold difference in expression after 8 days of 4‐OHT treatment for mRNAs, relative to day 0 of treatment (tpm ≥ 1) with ( n = 6,034) and without ( n = 7,887) evidence of AGO2‐binding by HEAP (Li et al , 2020). FDistribution of the relative fold change after 8 days of 4‐OHT treatment in steady‐state abundance, relative to day 0 of treatment, for mESC‐expressed (tpm ≥ 1) mRNAs ( n = 19,306, red), cytosolic ( n = 445, blue) and nuclear ( n = 529, grey) lncRNAs (two‐tailed Mann–Whitney U ‐test, mRNAs vs cytosolic lncRNAs P ‐value < 2 × 10 −16 and cytosolic vs nuclear lncRNAs P = 0.875).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, owing to advances in sequencing technologies, the field is rapidly progressing from studying a single miRNA and a few of its targets to identifying miRNA-target networks associated with distinct cell types and developmental stages ( Nowakowski et al, 2018 ). This effort is complemented by new technologies that allow precise mapping of miRNA-target interactions (mTI) in specific cell types ( Tan et al, 2013 ; Li et al, 2020 ). Integrating miRNA and target expression profile with mTI mapping will deliver, for the first time, the landscape of miRNA repression in specific cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%