2023
DOI: 10.1029/2023gl104168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Resolution Interseismic Strain Mapping From InSAR Phase‐Gradient Stacking: Application to the North Anatolian Fault With Implications for the Non‐Uniform Strain Distribution Related to Coseismic Slip Distribution

Abstract: High‐resolution interseismic strain mapping is important for studying faulting behavior and for assessing seismic hazards. Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar has been widely applied to measure interseismic deformation along active strike‐slip faults. However, phase unwrapping errors and over‐smoothing effects limit its ability to map the extremely‐high strain due to shallow creep. Here, without the involvement of ground‐based measurement, we perform phase‐gradient stacking on wrapped Sentinel‐1 interfero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of the range and azimuth direction to seismic fault zones and active faults has been investigated [26][27][28], but the detection of landslides using only the range or azimuthal direction is subject to partial erroneous detection of landslides [34]. This is mainly due to the fact that gradients mainly detect boundary information, so landslides with deformation appear as two neighboring regions in the detection results of a single direction phase gradient stacking [34], which leads to a situation where some landslides are not signaled in one direction but are signaled in other directions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Range and Azimuth Phase Gradient Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of the range and azimuth direction to seismic fault zones and active faults has been investigated [26][27][28], but the detection of landslides using only the range or azimuthal direction is subject to partial erroneous detection of landslides [34]. This is mainly due to the fact that gradients mainly detect boundary information, so landslides with deformation appear as two neighboring regions in the detection results of a single direction phase gradient stacking [34], which leads to a situation where some landslides are not signaled in one direction but are signaled in other directions.…”
Section: Comparison Of Range and Azimuth Phase Gradient Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase gradient method is gradually being used to locate deformation regions. It has been used to detect the deformation information associated with seismic fault zones [26,27] and faults [28]. The deformation range caused by these cases is relatively large, often extending for thousands or tens of kilometers in space, and these regions can be identified by the phase gradient method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) have been widely used to map large‐scale tectonic deformation and strain accumulation along active faults in actively deforming regions, such as, the North Anatolian fault, the Pamir convergent belt, and the San Andreas fault (Bletery et al., 2020; Fialko, 2006; Hussain et al., 2018; Jolivet et al., 2023; Y. X. Li et al., 2023; Liu & Wang, 2023; Metzger et al., 2021; Rousset et al., 2016; Weiss et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021). Here, we combine GNSS and InSAR to obtain 3D surface deformation rate maps with minimized rate offsets across adjacent InSAR swaths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%