2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9201(02)00207-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution magnetic field modeling: application to MAGSAT and Ørsted data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we pick up a model g j , γ j from the literature (Langlais et al, 2003;K [int] = 16, K [ext] = 2 ) and compute the values X , Y , Z of the model field at M points which are "real" points in the sense that there are points of the orbits of Champ where real measurements were made (specifically the data points corresponding to 130 days centered at 2003.0). We select N points P l from the whole set, the one closest to an optimal array of 1000 or 3000 points {Q l }, as explained in Fig.…”
Section: A Synthetic Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we pick up a model g j , γ j from the literature (Langlais et al, 2003;K [int] = 16, K [ext] = 2 ) and compute the values X , Y , Z of the model field at M points which are "real" points in the sense that there are points of the orbits of Champ where real measurements were made (specifically the data points corresponding to 130 days centered at 2003.0). We select N points P l from the whole set, the one closest to an optimal array of 1000 or 3000 points {Q l }, as explained in Fig.…”
Section: A Synthetic Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…significantly improved by using the recent satellite vector magnetic surveys carried out by the Ørsted, CHAMP and SAC-C missions. These missions permit the study of the geographical pattern of the secular variation during each satellite's lifetime, and also allow a comparison with former data from the MAGSAT mission in 1979 to 1980 (Langlais et al, 2003). Comparisons of MAGSAT and CHAMP satellite data indicate that the relative decrease of the geomagnetic field is particularly strong in the Atlantic and American sector (Figure 2).…”
Section: B 3c 3amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, as the main field is large, a significant noise may result. For this reason, a degree 13 main field model at epoch 2000 computed by Langlais et al (2003) was substracted from the data. The result is denoted B=B−B model for the vector field, X, Y , Z for each component and F for the field intensity.…”
Section: Removing the Main Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%