1993
DOI: 10.1109/77.233522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution magnetic microscopy using a DC SQUID

Abstract: Using a 4.2K Nb-PbIn dc SQUID with a 60 pm inner hole side length, we have constructed a novel 1-D magnetic flux microscope with an unprecedented combination of spatial and magnetic field resolutions. During imaging, the sample is moved past the SQUID at a separation of about 38 pm and the output from the SQUID is recorded as a function of the sample position. The system achieves a spatial resolution of about 66 pm and a magnetic field resolution of about 5.2 pTHz-lD at a frequency of 6 kHz. We have used the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain-boundary-junction-based high-T c SQUIDs are further implemented in systems for nondestructive evaluation, e.g., of aircraft parts (Hohmann et al, 1997;Krause et al, 1997;Kreutzbruck et al, 1997;Mü ck et al, 1997) or reinforcing rods in concrete structures, for the detection of fine magnetic particles in copper wire (Nagaishi et al, 1997), in biology, and for geophysical surveying. Scanning SQUID microscopy is an enticing extension of these applications (see, for example, Mathai et al, 1992Mathai et al, , 1993Kirtley et al, 1994), which in high-T c versions employing bicrystal grain-boundary junctions was introduced by the groups of Wellstood at the University of Maryland (Black et al, 1993) and of Clarke at UC Berkeley (T. S. Lee et al, , 1997. Even though these microscopes are based on cryogenic sensors, they allow investigations of samples kept at room temperature.…”
Section: A Squidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain-boundary-junction-based high-T c SQUIDs are further implemented in systems for nondestructive evaluation, e.g., of aircraft parts (Hohmann et al, 1997;Krause et al, 1997;Kreutzbruck et al, 1997;Mü ck et al, 1997) or reinforcing rods in concrete structures, for the detection of fine magnetic particles in copper wire (Nagaishi et al, 1997), in biology, and for geophysical surveying. Scanning SQUID microscopy is an enticing extension of these applications (see, for example, Mathai et al, 1992Mathai et al, , 1993Kirtley et al, 1994), which in high-T c versions employing bicrystal grain-boundary junctions was introduced by the groups of Wellstood at the University of Maryland (Black et al, 1993) and of Clarke at UC Berkeley (T. S. Lee et al, , 1997. Even though these microscopes are based on cryogenic sensors, they allow investigations of samples kept at room temperature.…”
Section: A Squidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To begin a measurement, we first use the SQUID microscope to determine the static magnetic field [14] and then use a field coil to null the field to better than &bp/10 in the sample SQUIDs. We next take magnetic images of the sample and, if trapped flux is found, thermally cycle the sample until all the flux is gone.…”
Section: Experimental Proof Of a Time-reversal-invariant Order Paramementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capabilities of systems with cryogenic samples is even more impressive. SQUID microscopes have been demonstrated with a spatial resolution as fine as 4 µm for samples that are in the same cryogenic environment as the SQUID sensor (14,16,(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). Systems with both the sample and the SQUID immersed in liquid helium have 66 µm resolution and 5.2 pT/ √ Hz noise at 6 kHz (42), and 10 µm at 100 pT/ √ Hz (43); the Conductus Scanning Magnetic Microscope TM provided micron resolution for helium-temperature samples (38).…”
Section: Scanning Squid Microscopesmentioning
confidence: 99%