2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(11)64358-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Manometry Findings in Patients With Esophageal Epiphrenic Diverticula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the majority of previous studies of esophageal motility associated with diverticula have used conventional manometry, one study utilizing HRM included nine patients and though they did not apply a consensus classification scheme (e.g. the Chicago Classification), they reported achalasia in six (66%) patients (one of whom the manometry catheter was unable to traverse the EGJ) . Similarly, a study of 21 patients with esophageal diverticula that used endoscopic placement to ensure traversal of the EGJ with the conventional manometry catheter and also 24‐h ambulatory manometry in six patients reported achalasia as the most commonly observed motility diagnosis (43%); however, more similarly to our findings, they also reported 5/21 patients with DES (defined as multipeaked, high‐amplitude contractions with >30% simultaneous pressure waves) and 2/21 with nutcracker (high‐amplitude, long‐duration contraction); thus potentially patients that may have been classified as jackhammer esophagus with HRM/EPT evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the majority of previous studies of esophageal motility associated with diverticula have used conventional manometry, one study utilizing HRM included nine patients and though they did not apply a consensus classification scheme (e.g. the Chicago Classification), they reported achalasia in six (66%) patients (one of whom the manometry catheter was unable to traverse the EGJ) . Similarly, a study of 21 patients with esophageal diverticula that used endoscopic placement to ensure traversal of the EGJ with the conventional manometry catheter and also 24‐h ambulatory manometry in six patients reported achalasia as the most commonly observed motility diagnosis (43%); however, more similarly to our findings, they also reported 5/21 patients with DES (defined as multipeaked, high‐amplitude contractions with >30% simultaneous pressure waves) and 2/21 with nutcracker (high‐amplitude, long‐duration contraction); thus potentially patients that may have been classified as jackhammer esophagus with HRM/EPT evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esophageal diverticula may also be related to an increased risk for aspiration . A common association with achalasia has been reported in numerous previous studies, most utilizing conventional manometry to assess esophageal motility; thus, the basis of diverticula formation is often thought to be related to increased intra‐esophageal pressures related to esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO) . However, other esophageal motility diagnoses, defined by varying conventional‐manometry‐based criteria, including non‐specific esophageal motility, distal esophageal spasm (DES), and nutcracker esophagus have been reported in varying frequencies in series of patients with esophageal diverticula …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan›da alt›n standart özofagografidir (1). Bizim her iki hastam›za da ilk tan› gastroskopi ile konulmufltur.…”
Section: Tartifimaunclassified
“…Apparently, normal motility in manometry test in patients with epiphrenic diverticulum might be related to the type of manometric testing used or the intermittent nature of some disorders such as the diffuse oesophageal spasm. Although earlier series used conventional manometry, a recent study has evaluated oesophageal motility with HRM in patients with ED [13]. This involved nine patients, and all of whom had motility disorder.…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%