2018
DOI: 10.3788/lop55.022802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Resolution Remote Sensing Image Classification Combining with Mean-Shift Segmentation and Fully Convolution Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with traditional machine-learning classification methods such as RF and SVM, the U-Net method improves the classification accuracy by 6.42-25.91% using the same RGB image and the ground truth land-cover map. This result is in agreement with previous studies that applied the deep learning network model to remote-sensing land-use classification [45][46][47]. In this study, to form a reciprocity in data with traditional machine-learning classification methods, without too many manual steps to extract and select features [47,48], using 6 cm very-high-resolution UAV color images for AMD and mine land-cover classification, the overall classification accuracies of traditional machine-learning classification methods SVM and RF were lower than that of U-Net.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Compared with traditional machine-learning classification methods such as RF and SVM, the U-Net method improves the classification accuracy by 6.42-25.91% using the same RGB image and the ground truth land-cover map. This result is in agreement with previous studies that applied the deep learning network model to remote-sensing land-use classification [45][46][47]. In this study, to form a reciprocity in data with traditional machine-learning classification methods, without too many manual steps to extract and select features [47,48], using 6 cm very-high-resolution UAV color images for AMD and mine land-cover classification, the overall classification accuracies of traditional machine-learning classification methods SVM and RF were lower than that of U-Net.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Many subsequent classification studies are based on the idea of the FCN network. Fang et al [36] applied the FCN to the classification of high-resolution remote sensing images; their results showed that the FCN can better obtain the essential features of ground features in images. Moreover, the mean drift segmentation algorithm can be used to optimize the edge of the obtained probability map results and improve the classification accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of describing the characteristic image, it is necessary to accurately identify the fuzzy area of the image, collect and detect the noisy area in the image, that is, the fuzzy area, judge and analyze the characteristic point diffusion characteristics of the imaging area, and analyze the image blur characteristics in combination with the convolution principle of point spread function (PSF). The image features are converted into deconvolution characteristics [9] . Select the obvious feature points between the original image and the corrected image, establish the image dynamic reconstruction model, standardize the mapping relationship between the original image and the reconstructed image, and locate the real longitude and latitude of each pixel in the UAV remote sensing image.…”
Section: Implementation Of Dynamic Reconstruction Of Remote Sensing Imagementioning
confidence: 99%