4th EEGS Meeting 1998
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201407175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution seismic reflection, EM and electrokinetic SP applied to landslide studies: "Le Boup" landslide (Western Swiss Alps)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main objectives of geophysical surveys are: (1) geometrical reconstruction of landslide bodies (lateral extension and thickness); (2) identification of sliding surfaces found between the landslide body and the underlying bedrock; and (3) studying the movements and accumulations of groundwater flows that may provoke landslide reactions (McCann and Forster, 1990;Bruno and Marillier, 2000;Gallipoli et al, 2000;Hack, 2000;Mauritsch et al, 2000;Lapenna et al, 2003). Recently, great attention has been focused on geoelectrical techniques, such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (Griffiths and Barker, 1993;Loke and Barker, 1996;Giano et al, 2000;Schmutz et al, 2000) and self-potential (SP) techniques (Bogoslovsky and Ogilvy, 1977;Patella et al, 1995;Bruno et al, 1998;Revil et al, 2002). Both methods show high spatial resolution capability and are characterized by relatively fast field data acquisition and low costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main objectives of geophysical surveys are: (1) geometrical reconstruction of landslide bodies (lateral extension and thickness); (2) identification of sliding surfaces found between the landslide body and the underlying bedrock; and (3) studying the movements and accumulations of groundwater flows that may provoke landslide reactions (McCann and Forster, 1990;Bruno and Marillier, 2000;Gallipoli et al, 2000;Hack, 2000;Mauritsch et al, 2000;Lapenna et al, 2003). Recently, great attention has been focused on geoelectrical techniques, such as electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (Griffiths and Barker, 1993;Loke and Barker, 1996;Giano et al, 2000;Schmutz et al, 2000) and self-potential (SP) techniques (Bogoslovsky and Ogilvy, 1977;Patella et al, 1995;Bruno et al, 1998;Revil et al, 2002). Both methods show high spatial resolution capability and are characterized by relatively fast field data acquisition and low costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unstable materials exhibit variation in physical properties of the subsurface, which can be seen as changes in P-wave velocities [ 24 ]. The ERT method is applied to investigate resistivity values of materials in the subsurface [ 25 ]. The resistivity value is sensitive to changes in lithology particularly moisture and clay content in the subsurface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method that was found was seismic re ection method, that is still in use, was developed in 1921 (Dragoset, 2007). High-resolution seismic re ection pro ling was a particularly useful tool for imaging the rupture surface, internal bedding, and subsurface geometry of landslide structures (Bruno & Marillier, 2000). But (Jongmans & Garambois, 2007), setting up on uneven terrain was challenging and was time consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%