1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02117.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy of Ti4AlN3, or Ti3Al2N2 Revisited

Abstract: The structure and chemistry of what initially was proposed to be Ti 3 Al 2 N 2 are incorrect. Using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, together with chemical analysis, the stoichiometry of this compound is concluded to be Ti 4 AlN 3−␦ (where ␦ = 0.1). The structure is layered, wherein every four layers of almost-close-packed Ti atoms are separated by a layer of Al atoms. The N atoms occupy ∼97.5% of the octahedral sites between the Ti atoms. The unit cell is comprised of eight layers of Ti atoms… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The history of theoretical predictions of new MAX phases begins with the debate on the structure of Ti 4 AlN 3 , which in the 1990s was proposed to be either Ti 3 AlN 2 or Ti 3 Al 2 N 2 [83,84], but was finally determined to be Ti 4 AlN 3 [85,86,87]. This conclusion inspired Holm et al [88] [89], and it was logical to proceed with an attempt to synthesize Ti 4 SiC 3 .…”
Section: Predictions Of New Max Phasesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The history of theoretical predictions of new MAX phases begins with the debate on the structure of Ti 4 AlN 3 , which in the 1990s was proposed to be either Ti 3 AlN 2 or Ti 3 Al 2 N 2 [83,84], but was finally determined to be Ti 4 AlN 3 [85,86,87]. This conclusion inspired Holm et al [88] [89], and it was logical to proceed with an attempt to synthesize Ti 4 SiC 3 .…”
Section: Predictions Of New Max Phasesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…22) As is well known, nonmetal vacancies were generally found in MAX phases. [23][24][25] Therefore, the discrepancy between the calculated and experimental thermal expansion coefficient of Ti 2 SC and Ti 2 AlC can be attributed to the vacancies effects.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, C-vacancies are most probably present. 48 In the rest of this study, we focus only on two starting compositions with the proper stoichiometric ratios that resulted in Mo 2 TiAlC 2 and Mo 2 Ti 2 AlC 3 , viz., 2Mo:Ti:1.1Al:2C and 2Mo:2Ti:1.1Al:2.7C, respectively.…”
Section: Alcmentioning
confidence: 99%