25th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1987
DOI: 10.2514/6.1987-547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High resolution upwind schemes for the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…delta wing, low Reynolds number, vortex flows Aerodynamics of slender delta wing with large swept angle, which is widely adopted in modern fighter aircrafts and missiles, has been investigated experimentally and numerically over decades. Nowadays, the flow characteristics of slender delta wing are well understood [1][2][3] , and the typical flow structures are as follows: The local separation from the leading edge generates a pair of counter-rotating primary vortices on the leeward surface of the wing, the leading-edge vortices spiral around the vortex axis and move downstream, the separated flow attaches on the leeward surface and induces secondary separation due to the vortex/wall interaction.The recent development of unmanned air vehicle (UAV) and micro air vehicle (MAV) has stimulated the investigation on low and moderate swept delta wings [4][5][6][7] . Generally speaking, the flow structures over these nonslender delta wings share some similarity with large swept wing, such as the leading-edge vortices and the separation-reattachment flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…delta wing, low Reynolds number, vortex flows Aerodynamics of slender delta wing with large swept angle, which is widely adopted in modern fighter aircrafts and missiles, has been investigated experimentally and numerically over decades. Nowadays, the flow characteristics of slender delta wing are well understood [1][2][3] , and the typical flow structures are as follows: The local separation from the leading edge generates a pair of counter-rotating primary vortices on the leeward surface of the wing, the leading-edge vortices spiral around the vortex axis and move downstream, the separated flow attaches on the leeward surface and induces secondary separation due to the vortex/wall interaction.The recent development of unmanned air vehicle (UAV) and micro air vehicle (MAV) has stimulated the investigation on low and moderate swept delta wings [4][5][6][7] . Generally speaking, the flow structures over these nonslender delta wings share some similarity with large swept wing, such as the leading-edge vortices and the separation-reattachment flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…delta wing, low Reynolds number, vortex flows Aerodynamics of slender delta wing with large swept angle, which is widely adopted in modern fighter aircrafts and missiles, has been investigated experimentally and numerically over decades. Nowadays, the flow characteristics of slender delta wing are well understood [1][2][3] , and the typical flow structures are as follows: The local separation from the leading edge generates a pair of counter-rotating primary vortices on the leeward surface of the wing, the leading-edge vortices spiral around the vortex axis and move downstream, the separated flow attaches on the leeward surface and induces secondary separation due to the vortex/wall interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present point and line relaxation schemes are similar to those used by Rogers et al [10,19] but with slight modifications to the point relaxation scheme in the formation of the left-hand-side matrices and in the sweeping strategy. The author also tried the LU-SGS scheme [18,38] and the approximation factorization-planar symmetric Gauss-Seidel scheme [13] and found that the overall computing time was greater than that of the diagonalized ADI scheme; thus these implicit schemes were excluded in this work. The discretization for the convective terms used is an upwind differencing scheme based on Roe's approximate Riemann solver [39] with Van Leer's MUSCL formulation [40], which was applied to the ACM and recommended for its computational efficiency and accuracy in [11,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upwind differencing schemes that have been used include the flux-differencing splitting [9,10], MUSCL [11,12], TVD [13,14], and WENO [15] schemes; the solution techniques that have been implemented cover the BeamWarming scheme [16,17], the approximation factorization-planar symmetric Gauss-Seidel scheme [13], lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel (LU-SGS) scheme [15,18], line and point relaxation schemes [10,19], the explicit multistage Runge-Kutta method [20], and so on. The application is also extended to unsteady flow computations [9,10,20] by using a dual-time-stepping procedure that subiterates at each physical time step and drives the divergence of the velocity toward zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this method is improved by introducing the efficient numerical techniques such as the linearization of Steger and Kutler (1977), diagonalization of Chang et al (1988), etc. and also extended to the orthogonal and generalized curvilinear coordinate system reported by Hartwich and Hsu (1988) and Dick (1989). The other widely used method for solving unsteady incompressible Navier-Stokes equations is the well known MAC (Marker and Cell) method developed by Harlow and Welch (1965) The basic equations are the unsteady NavierStokes equations for three-dimensional incompressible rotational flow which in term of relative velocity with respect to the rotational reference frame can be written as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%